Litcius/Paper detail

The global implications of U.S. withdrawal from WHO and the USAID shutdown: challenges and strategic policy considerations

Auwal Rabiu Auwal, Abubakar Sunusi Ishak, Shuaibu Saidu Musa, Abbas Musa, Abubakar Saadu, Anila Riaz

2025Frontiers in Public Health14 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The U.S. withdrawal from the WHO and the shutdown of USAID disrupt global health governance, threatening disease surveillance and reversing progress made in combating HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria through initiatives like PEPFAR. The WHO's central role in coordinating global health responses, exemplified by its leadership in the COVAX initiative, is critical to pandemic preparedness and equitable vaccine distribution. The disengagement decision undermines humanitarian relief efforts, particularly in fragile states where U.S. contributions are vital for food security, education, and healthcare. This policy brief outlines actionable recommendations to mitigate the risks of U.S. disengagement, focusing on regional health capacity-building, public-private partnerships, and the continuation of critical investments in global health systems.

Topics & Concepts

Public healthGlobal healthDisengagement theoryHealth policyPreparednessPolitical scienceEconomic growthPandemicMedicinePublic relationsEconomicsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DiseaseNursingInfectious disease (medical specialty)GerontologyLawPathologyViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
The global implications of U.S. withdrawal from WHO and the USAID shutdown: challenges and strategic policy considerations | Litcius