Litcius/Paper detail

Undivided Forward-Looking Moral Responsibility

Derk Pereboom

2021The Monist31 citationsDOI

Abstract

Abstract This article sets out a forward-looking account of moral responsibility on which the ground-level practice is directly sensitive to aims such as moral formation and reconciliation, and is not subject to a barrier between tiers. On the contrasting two-tier accounts defended by Daniel Dennett and Manuel Vargas, the ground-level practice features backward-looking, desert-invoking justifications that are in turn justified by forward-looking considerations at the higher tier. The concern raised for the two-tier view is that the ground-level practice will be insufficiently responsive to the forward-looking aims that are held to justify it. On the single-tier alternative, forward-looking considerations can more readily motivate substantial revisions, which the practice, due to serious and pervasive deficiencies, requires.

Topics & Concepts

Subject (documents)Moral responsibilityCommon groundEpistemologyLaw and economicsSociologyPhilosophy of mindEnvironmental ethicsPhilosophyMetaphysicsComputer scienceLibrary scienceCommunicationFree Will and AgencyWar, Ethics, and JustificationPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Undivided Forward-Looking Moral Responsibility | Litcius