Litcius/Paper detail

Predicting Outcomes of Indeterminate Bone Lesions on<sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT Scans in the Setting of High-Risk Primary or Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Tim E. Phelps, Stephanie A. Harmon, Esther Mena, Liza Lindenberg, Joanna H. Shih, Deborah E. Citrin, Peter A. Pinto, Bradford J. Wood, William L. Dahut, James L. Gulley, Ravi A. Madan, Peter L. Choyke, Barış Türkbey

2022Journal of Nuclear Medicine23 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Indeterminate bone lesions (IBLs) on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT are common. This study aimed to define variables that predict whether such lesions are likely malignant or benign using features on PSMA PET/CT. Methods: 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging was performed on 243 consecutive patients with high-risk primary or biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. IBLs identified on PSMA PET/CT could not definitively be interpreted as benign or malignant. Medical records of patients with IBLs were reviewed to determine the ultimate status of each lesion. IBLs were deemed malignant or benign on the basis of evidence of progression or stability at follow-up, respectively, or by biopsy results; IBLs were deemed equivocal when insufficient or unclear evidence existed. Post hoc patient, lesion, and scan variables accounting for clustered data were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum and x 2 tests to determine features that favored benign or malignant interpretation. Results: Overall, 98 IBLs within 267 bone lesions (36.7%) were identified in 48 of 243 patients (19.8%). Thirtyseven of 98 IBLs were deemed benign, and 42 were deemed malignant, of which 8 had histologic verification; 19 remained equivocal. Location and SUV max categorical variables were predictive of IBL interpretation (P 5 0.0201 and P 5 0.0230, respectively). For IBLs with new interpretations, 34 of 37 (91.9%) considered benign showed an SUV max of less than 5 or exhibited focal uptake without coexisting bone metastases; 37 of 42 (88.1%) deemed malignant demonstrated an SUV max of at least 5 or were present with coexisting bone metastases. Logistic regression predicted IBLs with a high SUV max (univariable: odds ratio [OR], 9.29 [P 5 0.0016]; multivariable: OR, 13.87 [P 5 0.0089]) or present with other bone metastases (univariable: OR, 9.87 [P 5 0.0112]; multivariable: OR, 11.35 [P 5 0.003]) to be malignant. Conclusion: IBLs on PSMA PET/CT are concerning; however, characterizing their location, SUV, and additional scan findings can aid interpretation. IBLs displaying an SUV max of at least 5 or present with other bone metastases favor malignancy. IBLs without accompanying bone metastases that exhibit an SUV max of less than 5 and are observed only in atypical locations favor benign processes. These guidelines may assist in the interpretation of IBLs on PSMA PET/CT.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineProstate cancerRadiologyProstateLesionIndeterminateBiopsyPET-CTNuclear medicineCancerPositron emission tomographyPathologyInternal medicineMathematicsPure mathematicsProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Predicting Outcomes of Indeterminate Bone Lesions on<sup>18</sup>F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT Scans in the Setting of High-Risk Primary or Recurrent Prostate Cancer | Litcius