Litcius/Paper detail

Modelling the potential cost-effectiveness of food-based programs to reduce malnutrition

Patrick Webb, Goodarz Danaei, William A. Masters, Katherine L. Rosettie, Ashley A. Leech, Joshua T. Cohen, Mia M. Blakstad, Sarah Kranz, Dariush Mozaffarian

2021Global Food Security18 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Poor quality diets contribute to malnutrition globally, but evidence is weak on the cost-effectiveness of food-based interventions that shift diets. This study assessed 11 candidate interventions developed through Delphi techniques to improve diets in India, Nigeria, and Ethiopia. A Markov simulation model incorporated time, individual-level, nutrition, and policy parameters to estimate health impacts and cost-effectiveness for reducing stunting, anaemia, diarrhea, and mortality in preschool children. At an assumed 80% coverage, interventions considered would potentially save between 0·16 and 3·20 years of life per child. The average cost-effectiveness ratio ranged from US$9 to US$2000 per life year saved. This approach, linking expert knowledge, known costs, and modelling, offers potential for estimating cost-effective investments for better informed policy choice where empirical evidence is limited.

Topics & Concepts

Psychological interventionMalnutritionEnvironmental healthCost effectivenessDelphi methodFood securityCost–benefit analysisCost-effectiveness analysisQuality-adjusted life yearMedicineBusinessRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceAgricultureGeographyNursingArtificial intelligenceEcologyBiologyPathologyArchaeologyChild Nutrition and Water AccessPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues