Litcius/Paper detail

Intraoperative Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring and the Potential Pitfalls of Invasively Measured Systolic Blood Pressure

Sean Lam, Hong Liu, Zhongping Jian, Jos J. Settels, Christian Bohringer

2021Cureus37 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Invasive intraarterial blood pressure measurement is currently the gold standard for intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring but accurate systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement is difficult in everyday clinical practice, mostly because of problems with hyper-resonance or damping within the measurement system, which can lead to erroneous treatment decisions if these phenomena are not recognized. A hyper-resonant blood pressure trace significantly overestimates true systolic blood pressure while underestimating the diastolic pressure. Invasively measured systolic blood pressure is also significantly more affected than mean blood pressure by the site of measurement within the arterial system. Patients in the intraoperative period should be treated based on the invasively measured mean blood pressure rather than the systolic blood pressure. In this review, we discuss the pros/cons, mechanisms of invasive blood pressure measurements, and the interpretation of the invasively measured systolic blood pressure value.

Topics & Concepts

Blood pressureMedicineCardiologyHemodynamicsPressure measurementInternal medicineContinuous noninvasive arterial pressureDiastoleAnesthesiaEngineeringMechanical engineeringHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Intraoperative Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring and the Potential Pitfalls of Invasively Measured Systolic Blood Pressure | Litcius