Litcius/Paper detail

Order-Fair Consensus in the Permissionless Setting

Mahimna Kelkar, Soubhik Deb, Sreeram Kannan

202238 citationsDOI

Abstract

Transaction-order-manipulation attacks have become commonplace in public blockchains such as Ethereum, costing hundreds of millions of dollars. In these blockchains, a miner can unilaterally determine the order of transactions inside a block, and this ordering is not checked by other users, leaving room for the miner to manipulate the order for its own benefit. This gap is also evident from existing security results for permissionless blockchains. As prime examples, the breakthrough work of Garay et al. (Eurocrypt 2015) and Pass et al. (Eurocrypt 2017) showed the security properties of consistency and liveness for Nakamoto's seminal proof-of-work protocol. However, consistency and liveness do not provide any guarantees on the relationship between the order in which transactions arrive into the network and the finalized order in the ledger.

Topics & Concepts

LivenessComputer scienceConsistency (knowledge bases)Database transactionOrder (exchange)Proof-of-work systemBlock (permutation group theory)Computer securityProtocol (science)BlockchainDatabaseDistributed computingBusinessMathematicsArtificial intelligenceFinancePathologyGeometryAlternative medicineMedicineBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCryptography and Data SecurityInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Order-Fair Consensus in the Permissionless Setting | Litcius