Litcius/Paper detail

Effects of renormalon scheme and perturbative scale choices on determinations of the strong coupling from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> event shapes

Guido Bell, Christopher Lee, Yiannis Makris, Jim Talbert, Bin Yan

2024Physical review. D/Physical review. D.13 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

We study the role of renormalon cancellation schemes and perturbative scale choices in extractions of the strong coupling constant <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi>α</a:mi><a:mi>s</a:mi></a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:msub><a:mi>m</a:mi><a:mi>Z</a:mi></a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo></a:math> and the leading nonperturbative shift parameter <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:msub><e:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</e:mi><e:mn>1</e:mn></e:msub></e:math> from resummed predictions of the <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><h:msup><h:mi>e</h:mi><h:mo>+</h:mo></h:msup><h:msup><h:mi>e</h:mi><h:mo>−</h:mo></h:msup></h:math> event shape thrust. We calculate the thrust distribution to <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="normal">N</j:mi><j:mrow><j:mmultiscripts><j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="normal">L</j:mi></j:mrow><j:mprescripts/><j:none/><j:mrow><j:mn>3</j:mn></j:mrow></j:mmultiscripts></j:mrow><j:msup><j:mrow><j:mi mathvariant="normal">L</j:mi></j:mrow><j:mrow><j:mo>′</j:mo></j:mrow></j:msup></j:mrow></j:math> resummed accuracy in soft-collinear effective theory (SCET) matched to the fixed-order <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mi mathvariant="script">O</o:mi><o:mo stretchy="false">(</o:mo><o:msubsup><o:mi>α</o:mi><o:mi>s</o:mi><o:mn>2</o:mn></o:msubsup><o:mo stretchy="false">)</o:mo></o:math> prediction, and perform a new high-statistics computation of the <t:math xmlns:t="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><t:mi mathvariant="script">O</t:mi><t:mo stretchy="false">(</t:mo><t:msubsup><t:mi>α</t:mi><t:mi>s</t:mi><t:mn>3</t:mn></t:msubsup><t:mo stretchy="false">)</t:mo></t:math> matching in , although we do not include the latter in our final <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><y:msub><y:mi>α</y:mi><y:mi>s</y:mi></y:msub></y:math> fits due to some observed systematics that require further investigation. We are primarily interested in testing the phenomenological impact sourced from varying amongst three renormalon cancellation schemes and two sets of perturbative scale profile choices. We then perform a global fit to available data spanning center-of-mass energies between 35–207 GeV in each scenario. Relevant subsets of our results are consistent with prior SCET-based extractions of <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><ab:msub><ab:mi>α</ab:mi><ab:mi>s</ab:mi></ab:msub><ab:mo stretchy="false">(</ab:mo><ab:msub><ab:mi>m</ab:mi><ab:mi>Z</ab:mi></ab:msub><ab:mo stretchy="false">)</ab:mo></ab:math>, but we are also led to a number of novel observations. Notably, we find that the combined effect of altering the renormalon cancellation scheme and profile parameters can lead to few-percent-level impacts on the extracted values in the <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><eb:msub><eb:mi>α</eb:mi><eb:mi>s</eb:mi></eb:msub><eb:mo>−</eb:mo><eb:msub><eb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</eb:mi><eb:mn>1</eb:mn></eb:msub></eb:math> plane, indicating a potentially important systematic theory uncertainty that should be accounted for. We also observe that fits performed over windows dominated by dijet events are typically of a higher quality than those that extend into the far tails of the distributions, possibly motivating future fits focused more heavily in this region. Finally, we discuss how different estimates of the three-loop soft matching coefficient <hb:math xmlns:hb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><hb:msubsup><hb:mi>c</hb:mi><hb:mover accent="true"><hb:mi>S</hb:mi><hb:mo stretchy="false">˜</hb:mo></hb:mover><hb:mn>3</hb:mn></hb:msubsup></hb:math> can also lead to measurable changes in the fitted <lb:math xmlns:lb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><lb:mo stretchy="false">{</lb:mo><lb:msub><lb:mi>α</lb:mi><lb:mi>s</lb:mi></lb:msub><lb:mo>,</lb:mo><lb:msub><lb:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</lb:mi><lb:mn>1</lb:mn></lb:msub><lb:mo stretchy="false">}</lb:mo></lb:math> values. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Topics & Concepts

Scale (ratio)RenormalonScheme (mathematics)Coupling (piping)PhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsParticle physicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum chromodynamicsEngineeringMathematical analysisMechanical engineeringParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research