Diagnostic Methods for Vaginal Stenosis and Compliance to Vaginal Dilator Use: A Systematic Review
Natalia Carion Haddad, Leila Cristina Soares Brollo, Marco Aurélio Pinho Oliveira, Mário Bernardo-Filho
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vaginal stenosis (VS) is a common side effect of pelvic radiotherapy for gynecological cancer in women. It has a high incidence variability, likely due to unstandardized and subjective assessment methods. Furthermore, even though the worldwide standard treatment for VS is vaginal dilation, low compliance rates have been noted. AIM: To evaluate the parameters used to diagnose VS and to assess whether the lack of an objective measure of VS hampers vaginal dilator use. METHODS: A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA reporting guidelines was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched. Randomized trials and prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies published from January 2011 to February 2020 were included. OUTCOMES: The main outcome of this study was a review of the published literature on assessment methods for VS and compliance to vaginal dilator use. RESULTS: Of the 28 articles obtained, only 7 used objective methods to measure the vaginal volume. 3 studies have demonstrated patient's concern with VS development and showed a high compliance to dilator use, whereas others reported several barriers to dilator use. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Lack of an objective assessment method can be a predisposing factor for uncertain VS incidence rates and impair compliance to vaginal dilator therapy, leading to long-term VS and sexual dysfunction. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This is the first systematic review on the heterogeneity of VS evaluation methods and compliance to vaginal dilator use. All studies were comprehensively evaluated by 2 reviewers. The limitations included the heterogeneity of the study designs and the unstandardized criteria used to classify stenosis or to evaluate compliance to dilator use. Although 3 well-known databases were used, the inclusion of more data sources could have increased the number of publications included in this review. CONCLUSION: VS is frequently diagnosed using subjective parameters. Few unstandardized objective methods are used to evaluate this condition. Regarding compliance to vaginal dilator use, there was a high dropout rate during follow-up and no consensus on starting time or ideal usage. Haddad NC, Soares Brollo LC, Pinho Oliveira MA, et al. Diagnostic Methods for Vaginal Stenosis and Compliance to Vaginal Dilator Use: A Systematic Review. J Sex Med 2021;18:493-514.