Midterm outcomes of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation: Comparison with nonbridged recipients
Davorin Sef, Alessandra Verzelloni Sef, Vladimir Trkulja, Binu Raj, Nicholas Lees, Christopher Walker, Jerry Mitchell, Mario Petrou, Fabio De Robertis, Ulrich Stock, Ian McGovern
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is increasingly being used in acutely deteriorating patients with end-stage lung disease as a bridge to transplantation (BTT). It can allow critically ill recipients to remain eligible for lung transplants (LTx) while reducing pretransplant deconditioning. We analyzed early- and midterm postoperative outcomes of patients on VV-ECMO as a BTT and the impact of preoperative VV-ECMO on posttransplant survival outcomes. METHODS: All consecutive LTx performed at our institution between January 2012 and December 2018 were analyzed. After matching, BTT patients were compared with nonbridged LTx recipients. RESULTS: Out of 297 transplanted patients, 21 (7.1%) were placed on VV-ECMO as a BTT. After matching, we observed similar 30-day mortality between BTT and non-BTT patients (4.6% vs. 6.6%, p = .083) despite a higher incidence of early postoperative complications (need for ECMO, delayed chest closure, and acute kidney injury). Furthermore, preoperative VV-ECMO did not appear associated with 30-day or 1-year mortality in both frequentist and Bayesian analysis (odds ratio [OR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-3.49, p = .369; OR: 0.27, 95% credible interval: 0.01-3.82, p = 84.7%, respectively). In sensitivity analysis, both subgroups were similar in respect to 30-day (7.8% vs. 6.5%, p = .048) and 1-year mortality (12.5% vs. 18%, p = .154). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute refractory respiratory failure while waiting for LTx represent a high-risk cohort of patients. VV-ECMO as a BTT is a reasonable strategy in adult patients with acceptable operative mortality and 1-year survival comparable to non-BTT patients.