Comparing clinical outcomes of adults with obesity receiving tirzepatide versus bariatric metabolic surgery: A multi‐institutional propensity score‐matched study
Jheng‐Yan Wu, S.C Chan, Wan‐Hsuan Hsu, Chia‐Chih Kuo, Ya‐Wen Tsai, Tinghui Liu, Po‐Yu Huang, Min‐Hsiang Chuang, Tsung Yu, Chih‐Cheng Lai
Abstract
AIMS: This real-world study compared clinical outcomes between tirzepatide treatment and bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) in adults with obesity. METHODS: . Patients initiating tirzepatide treatment were compared with those undergoing BMS. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major adverse kidney events (MAKEs). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and stratified analyses were performed based on age, sex and BMI categories. RESULTS: After exclusions and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 84 884 matched pairs were analysed. The incidence of all-cause mortality was 0.19 per 100 person-years in the tirzepatide group compared with 0.57 in the BMS group. Tirzepatide was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with BMS (HR, 0.311; 95% CI, 0.257-0.375; p < 0.0001). The mortality benefits were consistent across age groups, genders and BMI categories. Tirzepatide also reduced the risk of MACEs (HR, 0.743; 95% CI, 0.673-0.821; p < 0.0001) and MAKEs (HR, 0.375; 95% CI, 0.336-0.419; p < 0.0001). Stratified analyses demonstrated significant reductions in primary and secondary outcomes across most categories. CONCLUSION: Tirzepatide demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with BMS in adults with obesity, including significant reductions in all-cause mortality, MACEs and MAKEs. These findings suggest that tirzepatide may serve as an effective non-surgical alternative to BMS, with broad applicability across diverse patient populations.