Plasma Sarcosine Measured by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Distinguishes Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Prostate Cancer from Benign Prostate Hyperplasia
Pavel A. Markin, Alex Brito, Natalia E. Moskaleva, M Fodor, Ekaterina V. Lartsova, Yevgeny V. Shpot, Yulia V. Lerner, Vasily Y. Mikhajlov, Natalia V. Potoldykova, Dimitry Enikeev, A. V. Lyundup, Svetlana A. Appolonova
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Sarcosine was postulated in 2009 as a biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa). Here, we assess plasma sarcosine as a biomarker that is complementary to prostate-specific antigen (PSA). METHODS: Plasma sarcosine was measured using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in adults classified as noncancerous controls (with benign prostate hyperplasia [BPH], n = 36), with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN, n = 16), or with PCa (n = 27). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Plasma sarcosine levels were higher in the PCa (2.0 µM [1.3-3.3 µM], P <.01) and the PIN (1.9 µM [1.2-6.5 µM], P <.001) groups than in the BPH (0.9 µM [0.6-1.4 µM]) group. Plasma sarcosine had "good" and "very good" discriminative capability to detect PIN (area under the curve [AUC], 0.734) and PCa (AUC, 0.833) versus BPH, respectively. The use of PSA and sarcosine together improved the overall diagnostic accuracy to detect PIN and PCa versus BPH. CONCLUSION: Plasma sarcosine measured by GC-MS had "good" and "very good" classification performance for distinguishing PIN and PCa, respectively, relative to noncancerous patients diagnosed with BPH.