Litcius/Paper detail

Comparison between Recurrent Networks and Temporal Convolutional Networks Approaches for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition

Mihai Nan, Mihai Trăşcău, Adina Magda Florea, Cezar Cătălin Iacob

2021Sensors38 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Action recognition plays an important role in various applications such as video monitoring, automatic video indexing, crowd analysis, human-machine interaction, smart homes and personal assistive robotics. In this paper, we propose improvements to some methods for human action recognition from videos that work with data represented in the form of skeleton poses. These methods are based on the most widely used techniques for this problem-Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). Initially, the paper explores and compares different ways to extract the most relevant spatial and temporal characteristics for a sequence of frames describing an action. Based on this comparative analysis, we show how a TCN type unit can be extended to work even on the characteristics extracted from the spatial domain. To validate our approach, we test it against a benchmark often used for human action recognition problems and we show that our solution obtains comparable results to the state-of-the-art, but with a significant increase in the inference speed.

Topics & Concepts

Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkAction recognitionRecurrent neural networkBenchmark (surveying)GraphInferenceActivity recognitionMachine learningDeep learningHuman skeletonPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial neural networkTheoretical computer scienceClass (philosophy)GeographyGeodesyHuman Pose and Action RecognitionGait Recognition and AnalysisAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Comparison between Recurrent Networks and Temporal Convolutional Networks Approaches for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition | Litcius