Litcius/Paper detail

Comparative physical and mechanical properties of a 3D printed temporary crown and bridge restorative material

Fábio Antônio Piola Rizzante, T.E.P. Bueno, G. Guimarães, Guilherme Faria Moura, Sorin Teich, Adilson Yoshio Furuse, Gustavo Mendonça

2023Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Background: The objective was to compare physic-mechanical properties of different materials used for temporary restorations. Material and Methods: Protemp 4/bisacrylic resin, Jet/acrylic resin, and Nexdent C&B/3D-printed resin samples (10mm diameter x 2mm thickness) were analyzed for surface roughness and color stability tests (baseline, after 5 thousand brushing cycles; and after artificial aging in water at 60oC for 24 hours) and Knoop microhardness. All data were checked for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test. Surface roughness and color stability were analyzed using two-way repeated measurements ANOVA, microhardness data was subjected to one-way ANOVA. All tests were followed by Tukey test and were performed with α=0.05. Results: <.001), the 3D printed resin showed the highest values and acrylic resin the lowest. Bysacylic resin was similar to both 3D printed and acrylic resins. Conclusions: Disinfection methods, hydroxyl radical, environment, surfaces, dentistry.

Topics & Concepts

Acrylic resinMaterials scienceKnoop hardness testIndentation hardnessSurface roughnessComposite materialCrown (dentistry)Surface finish3d printedBiomedical engineeringMicrostructureCoatingMedicineDental materials and restorationsEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsDental Erosion and Treatment