Litcius/Paper detail

Fracture Resistance of Three-unit Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated with Milled and 3D Printed Composite-based Materials

Hasan Skienhe, Mutlu Özcan, Rita Eid, Louis Hardan, Nawal Alharbi, Karim Corbani

2021The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice40 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the fracture resistance of three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) made of composite, high-density polymers (HDP), fiberreinforced composite (FRC), and metal-ceramic (MC) using different fabrication methods. Materials and methods: A typodont model was prepared to receive a three-unit FDP replacing a missing second maxillary premolar. The prepared model was digitally scanned using an intraoral scanner (Trios3, 3Shape, Denmark). In total, 60 FDPs were fabricated and divided into four groups (n = 15) according to the materials and fabrication method: the subtractive method was used for the FRC (Trilor, Bioloren, Italy) and the HDP (Ambarino, Creamed, Germany) groups; the HDP group was monolithic, whereas the FRC group was layered with a nanocomposite (G-aenial Sculpt, GC). The additive method was used for the 3D printed (3DP) nanocomposite (Irix Max, DWS, Italy) and the Cr-Co (Starbond CoS powder 30) infrastructure of the MC groups. The FDPs were adhesively seated on stereolithography (SLA) fabricated dies. All samples were subjected to thermomechanical loading and fracture testing. The data for maximum load (N) to fracture was statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Games-Howell post hoc test ( = 0.05).

Topics & Concepts

Composite numberDentistryMaterials scienceComposite materialFracture (geology)3d printedOrthodonticsBiomedical engineeringMedicineDental materials and restorationsDental Implant Techniques and OutcomesDental Research and COVID-19
Fracture Resistance of Three-unit Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated with Milled and 3D Printed Composite-based Materials | Litcius