Litcius/Paper detail

Pre-hospital rule-out of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome by a single troponin: final one-year outcomes of the ARTICA randomised trial

Goaris W A Aarts, Cyril Camaro, Eddy Adang, Laura Rodwell, Roger van Hout, Gijs Brok, Anouk Hoare, Frank de Pooter, Walter de Wit, G. Etienne Cramer, Roland R.J. van Kimmenade, Eva Ouwendijk, Martijn G. S. Rutten, E. S. Zegers, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Marc E. Gomes, Peter Damman, Niels van Royen

2024European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes13 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The healthcare burden of acute chest pain is enormous. In the randomized ARTICA trial, we showed that pre-hospital identification of low-risk patients and rule-out of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) with point-of-care (POC) troponin measurement reduces 30-day healthcare costs with low major adverse cardiac events (MACE) incidence. Here we present the final 1-year results of the ARTICA trial. METHODS: Low-risk patients with suspected NSTE-ACS were randomized to pre-hospital rule-out with POC troponin measurement or emergency department (ED) transfer. Primary 1-year outcome was healthcare costs. Secondary outcomes were safety, quality of life (QoL), and cost-effectiveness. Safety was defined as a 1-year MACE consisting of ACS, unplanned revascularization, or all-cause death. QoL was measured with EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness was defined as 1-year healthcare costs difference per QoL difference. RESULTS: Follow-up was completed for all 863 patients. Healthcare costs were significantly lower in the pre-hospital strategy (€1932 ± €2784 vs. €2649 ± €2750), mean difference €717 [95% confidence interval (CI) €347 to €1087; P < 0.001]. In the total population, the 1-year MACE rate was comparable between groups [5.1% (22/434) in the pre-hospital strategy vs. 4.2% (18/429) in the ED strategy; P = 0.54]. In the ruled-out ACS population, 1-year MACE remained low [1.7% (7/419) vs. 1.4% (6/417)], risk difference 0.2% (95% CI -1.4% to 1.9%; P = 0.79). QoL showed no significant difference between strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital rule-out of NSTE-ACS with POC troponin testing in low-risk patients is cost-effective, as expressed by a sustainable healthcare cost reduction and no significant effect on QoL. One-year MACE remained low for both strategies.

Topics & Concepts

Acute coronary syndromeMedicineTroponinCardiologyInternal medicineElevation (ballistics)ST elevationEmergency medicineMyocardial infarctionMathematicsGeometryAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases