Litcius/Paper detail

A multi-hazard risk prioritisation framework for cultural heritage assets

Giacomo Sevieri, Carmine Galasso, Dina D’Ayala, Richard De Jesus, Andres Winston C. Oreta, Mary Earl Daryl A. Grio, Rhodella Ibabao

2020Natural hazards and earth system sciences102 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract. Multi-hazard risk assessment of building portfolios is of primary importance in natural-hazard-prone regions, particularly for the prioritisation of disaster risk reduction and resilience-enhancing strategies. In this context, cultural heritage assets require special consideration because of their high vulnerability to natural hazards – due to ageing and types of construction – and their strong links with communities from both an economic and a historical–sociocultural perspective. This paper introduces a multi-hazard risk prioritisation framework specifically developed for cultural heritage assets. The proposed framework relies on a multilevel rapid-visual-survey (RVS) form for the multi-hazard exposure data collection and risk prioritisation of case-study assets. Because of the multilevel architecture of the proposed RVS form, based on three levels of refinement and information, an increasing degree of accuracy can be achieved in the estimation of structural vulnerability and, ultimately, structural risk of the considered assets. At the lowest level of refinement, the collected data are used for the computation of seismic-risk and wind-risk prioritisation indices, specifically calibrated in this study for cultural heritage assets with various structural and non-structural features. The resulting indices are then combined into a unique multi-hazard risk prioritisation index in which the intangible value of cultural heritage assets is also considered. This is achieved by defining a score expressing the cultural significance of the asset. The analytic hierarchy process is extensively used throughout the study to reduce the subjectivity involved in the framework, thus obtaining a simplified yet robust approach which can be adapted to different building typologies. The proposed framework is applied to 25 heritage buildings in Iloilo City, Philippines, for which innovative, non-invasive techniques and tools for improved surveying have also been tested. Thermal and omnidirectional cameras have helped in the collection of structural data, together with drones for the inspection of roofs. Results of the study are presented and critically discussed, highlighting advantages and drawbacks of the use of new technologies in this field.

Topics & Concepts

HazardRisk analysis (engineering)Context (archaeology)Natural hazardVulnerability (computing)Asset (computer security)Computer scienceDisaster risk reductionCultural heritageRisk assessmentRisk managementResilience (materials science)Environmental resource managementBusinessGeographyEnvironmental planningComputer securityEnvironmental scienceChemistryThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryMeteorologyArchaeologyPhysicsFinanceMasonry and Concrete Structural AnalysisStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesBuilding materials and conservation