Litcius/Paper detail

‘Informed and empowered’: a mixed-methods study of crowdsourcing contests to promote uptake of HIV self-testing kits among African Americans

Allison Mathews, Donaldson F. Conserve, Hailey Mason, Lé Marus Alston, Stuart Rennie, Joseph D. Tucker

2020Journal of Virus Eradication15 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: HIV self-testing (HIVST) kits are a viable alternative to testing in clinical settings, but research on the effective ways of promoting uptake of HIVST kits has been lacking. The present study examines crowdsourcing contests as community engagement to promote uptake of HIVST kits among African Americans in the southern region of the US. METHODS: This mixed-methods study design evaluated two contests through qualitative assessment of contest entries. The first contest elicited ideas on how to promote HIVST kits. The second contest sought branding ideas for a pop-up HIVST booth. Qualitative data were digitally transcribed and analysed using MAXQDA software and axial coding. RESULTS: = 84, 28%). Contestants suggested making HIVST kits available in community sites and highlighting kits as potential sources of knowledge, relief and empowerment. CONCLUSION: Crowdsourcing contests are a beneficial community engagement tool to identify new ways to promote uptake of HIVST kits.

Topics & Concepts

CONTESTCrowdsourcingAxial codingEmpowermentQualitative researchCommunity engagementHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)MedicinePolitical sciencePublic relationsGrounded theorySociologyFamily medicineSocial scienceTheoretical samplingLawHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV Research and TreatmentEthics in Clinical Research
‘Informed and empowered’: a mixed-methods study of crowdsourcing contests to promote uptake of HIV self-testing kits among African Americans | Litcius