Impact of surgical resection of butterfly glioblastoma on survival: a meta-analysis based on comparative studies
Rafał Chojak, Marta Koźba‐Gosztyła, Katarzyna Słychan, Daniel Gajos, Marek Kotas, Michał Tyliszczak, Bogdan Czapiga
Abstract
Butterfly glioblastoma (bGBM) is a rare brain tumor that invades both hemispheres by crossing the corpus callosum. bGBM is associated with a dismal prognosis with a median survival time of a few months. Surgical resection is a rare treatment option due to the unfavorable location and assumed poor risk-to-benefit ratio. Therefore, a biopsy-alone approach is considered the main treatment option. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate whether resection of bGBM is associated with improved overall survival compared with biopsy alone. We searched three databases to find studies that compare resection with biopsy in 6-, 12- and 18-months overall survival in patients with bGBM. We calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) of mortality using a random-effects model. Five studies with 194 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Mortality was decreased for resection compared with biopsy at 6-months (RR 0.63 [95% CI 0.44-0.91]). No significant differences in overall survival were found at 12 (RR 0.76 [95% CI 0.50-1.14]) and 18-months (RR 0.84 [95% CI 0.56-1.26]). Surgical resection of bGBM is associated with an improved 6-months overall survival compared with biopsy alone. We have not found strong evidence supporting the superiority of resection over biopsy alone in overall survival at 12 and 18-months.