Litcius/Paper detail

Diversity and Inclusion in Unregulated mHealth Research: Addressing the Risks

Shawneequa Callier, Stephanie M. Fullerton

2020The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics17 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

mHealth devices and applications, with their wide accessibility and ease of use, have the potential to address persistent inequities in biomedical research participation. Yet, while mHealth technologies may facilitate more inclusive research participation, negative features of some unregulated use in research - misleading enrollment practices, the promotion of secondary mHealth applications, discriminatory profiling, and poorer quality feedback due to dependencies on biased data and algorithms - may threaten the trust and engagement of underrepresented individuals and communities. To maximize the participation of currently disenfranchised groups, those involved in unregulated mHealth research must become aware of potential risks, adopt targeted education policies, audit algorithms for hidden biases, and engage citizen scientists and other community members to identify and forestall possible harms.

Topics & Concepts

mHealthAuditProfiling (computer programming)Promotion (chess)Citizen scienceInclusion (mineral)Internet privacyDiversity (politics)BusinessPublic relationsPolitical sciencePsychologyComputer scienceSocial psychologyHealth careBiologyAccountingPoliticsOperating systemBotanyLawMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsSocial Media in Health EducationEthics in Clinical Research