Litcius/Paper detail

Durable effectiveness and safety of hybrid ablation versus catheter ablation: 2-year results from the randomized CEASE-AF trial

Nicolas Doll, Timo Weimar, Dariusz A. Kosior, Alan Bulava, Aleš Mokráček, Gerold Mönnig, Jonathan Sahu, Steven Hunter, M. C. E. F. Wijffels, Bart Van de Putte, Norman Rüb, Petr Němec, Tomas Ostrizek, Erik Fransén, Piotr Suwalski

2025European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery7 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The CEASE-AF trial demonstrated that epicardial-endocardial hybrid ablation (HA) had superior effectiveness compared to endocardial catheter ablation (CA) for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), without significantly increasing major complications during a 12-month period. Most contemporary AF ablation trials have not evaluated durability beyond 12 months. Therefore, 24-month effectiveness and safety of HA and CA are compared. METHODS: CEASE-AF is a prospective, multicentre, randomized trial. Patients 18-75 years of age with symptomatic, drug refractory persistent AF and left atrial diameter >4.0 cm or long-standing persistent AF were randomized 2:1 to HA (posterior wall and pulmonary vein isolation with left atrial appendage exclusion) or CA (pulmonary vein isolation). Secondary effectiveness was freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia off class I/III anti-arrhythmic drugs except for those who previously failed at doses not exceeding those previously failed through a 24-month follow-up period. Major complications and reinterventions were evaluated. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population was 102 patients with HA and 52 patients with CA. Seventy-five percent were male, 80.5% had persistent AF and 19.5% had long-standing persistent AF, with a mean age of 60.7 ± 7.9 years. Effectiveness for 24 months was 66.3% (63/95) with HA and 33.3% (17/51) with CA [absolute difference 33.0% (95% confidence interval 14.3%, 48.3%; P < 0.001)]. Major complication rates were 10.8% (11/102) with HA and 9.6% (5/52) with CA (P = 1.0), and fewer patients had reinterventions after HA than CA [18.9% (18/95) vs 52.9% (27/51), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: CEASE-AF demonstrated that the 32.4% absolute benefit of HA over CA for 12 months was durable for 24 months at 33% with continued similar safety rates and fewer reinterventions after HA (funded by AtriCure, Inc.; NCT02695277). CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION: NCT02695277.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineAtrial tachycardiaAtrial fibrillationAblationPulmonary veinRandomized controlled trialCatheter ablationCardiologyInternal medicineAtrial flutterSurgeryRefractory (planetary science)PopulationConfidence intervalEnvironmental healthAstrobiologyPhysicsAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies