Litcius/Paper detail

First-Line Selpercatinib or Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab in <i>RET</i> Fusion–Positive NSCLC

Caicun Zhou, Benjamin Solomon, Herbert H. Loong, Keunchil Park, M. Pérol, Edurne Arriola, Silvia Novello, Baohui Han, Jianying Zhou, Andrea Ardizzoni, M. Perez Mak, Fernando C. Santini, Yasir Y. Elamin, Alexander Drilon, Jürgen Wolf, Nalin Payakachat, Minji K. Uh, Deborah Rajakumar, Hongmei Han, Tarun Puri, Victoria Soldatenkova, Aimee Bence Lin, Boris K. Lin, Kōichi Goto

2023New England Journal of Medicine213 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a nonrandomized phase 1-2 study. METHODS: In a randomized phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line selpercatinib as compared with control treatment that consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab at the investigator's discretion. The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in both the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population (i.e., patients whose physicians had planned to treat them with pembrolizumab in the event that they were assigned to the control group) and the overall intention-to-treat population. Crossover from the control group to the selpercatinib group was allowed if disease progression as assessed by blinded independent central review occurred during receipt of control treatment. RESULTS: In total, 212 patients underwent randomization in the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population. At the time of the preplanned interim efficacy analysis, median progression-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9 to not estimable) with selpercatinib and 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 16.8) with control treatment (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.70; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 84% (95% CI, 76 to 90) with selpercatinib and 65% (95% CI, 54 to 75) with control treatment. The cause-specific hazard ratio for the time to progression affecting the central nervous system was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68). Efficacy results in the overall intention-to-treat population (261 patients) were similar to those in the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population. The adverse events that occurred with selpercatinib and control treatment were consistent with those previously reported. CONCLUSIONS: fusion-positive NSCLC. (Funded by Eli Lilly and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04194944.).

Topics & Concepts

PembrolizumabChemotherapyOncologyMedicineInternal medicineCancer researchCancerImmunotherapyCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations