A Scoping Review of Self-Management Interventions Following Spinal Cord Injury
Amanda McIntyre, Stephanie Marrocco, Samantha McRae, Lindsay Sleeth, Sander L. Hitzig, Susan Jaglal, Gary Linassi, Sarah Munce, Dalton L. Wolfe
Abstract
Objective: To conduct a scoping review to identify what components of self-management are embedded in self-management interventions for spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: In accordance with the approach and stages outlined by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), a comprehensive literature search was conducted using five databases. Study characteristics were extracted from included articles, and intervention descriptions were coded using Practical Reviews in Self-Management Support (PRISMS) (Pearce et al, 2016), Barlow et al (2002), and Lorig and Holman's (2003) taxonomy. Results: A total of 112 studies were included representing 102 unique self-management programs. The majority of the programs took an individual approach (52.0%) as opposed to a group (27.4%) or mixed approach (17.6%). While most of the programs covered general information, some provided specific symptom management. Peers were the most common tutor delivering the program material. The most common Barlow components included symptom management ( n = 44; 43.1%), information about condition/treatment ( n = 34; 33.3%), and coping ( n = 33; 32.4%). The most common PRISMS components were information about condition and management ( n = 85; 83.3%), training/rehearsal for psychological strategies ( n = 52; 51.0%), and lifestyle advice and support ( n = 52; 51.0%). The most common Lorig components were taking action ( n = 62; 60.8%), resource utilization ( n = 57; 55.9%), and self-tailoring ( n = 55; 53.9%). Conclusion: Applying self-management concepts to complex conditions such as SCI is only in the earliest stages of development. Despite having studied the topic from a broad perspective, this review reflects an ongoing program of research that links to an initiative to continue refining and testing self-management interventions in SCI.