Litcius/Paper detail

Velocity Performance Feedback During Ballistic Training: Which Is the Optimal Frequency of Feedback Administration?

Alejandro Pérez‐Castilla, Ainara Jiménez-Alonso, Mar Cepero, Sergio Miras‐Moreno, F. Javier Rojas, Amador García‐Ramos

2020Motor Control15 citationsDOI

Abstract

This study explored the impact of different frequencies of knowledge of results (KR) on velocity performance during ballistic training. Fifteen males completed four identical sessions (three sets of six repetitions at 30% one-repetition maximum during the countermovement jump and bench press throw) with the only difference of the KR condition provided: no feedback, velocity feedback after the first half of repetitions of each set (HalfKR), velocity feedback immediately after each repetition (ImKR), and feedback of the average velocity of each set (AvgKR). When compared with the control condition, the ImKR reported the highest velocity performance (1.9-5.3%), followed by the HalfKR (1.3-3.6%) and AvgKR (0.7-4.3%). These results support the verbal provision of velocity performance feedback after every repetition to induce acute improvements in velocity performance.

Topics & Concepts

JumpRepetition (rhetorical device)MathematicsCountermovementBench pressKnowledge of resultsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysicsPhysical therapyMedicineResistance trainingEngineeringTask (project management)Quantum mechanicsLinguisticsSystems engineeringPhilosophySports Performance and TrainingSport Psychology and PerformanceSports injuries and prevention
Velocity Performance Feedback During Ballistic Training: Which Is the Optimal Frequency of Feedback Administration? | Litcius