SDSS-IV MaNGA: Modeling the spectral line-spread function to subpercent accuracy
Shetty, S, Chen, Y, Drory, N, Bershady, MA, Westfall, KB, Cappellari, M, Brownstein, JR, Belfiore, F, Cherinka, B, Bizyaev, D, Lazarz, D, Law, DR, Yan, R
Abstract
<p>The Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV Mapping Nearby Galaxies at APO (MaNGA) program has been operating from 2014 to 2020, and has now observed a sample of 9269 galaxies in the low redshift universe (<em>z</em>&nbsp;&sim;&nbsp;0.05) with integral-field spectroscopy. With rest-optical (<em>&lambda;&lambda;</em>0.36&ndash;1.0&nbsp;<em>&mu;</em>m) spectral resolution&nbsp;<em>R</em>&nbsp;&sim;&nbsp;2000 the instrumental spectral line-spread function (LSF) typically has 1<em>&sigma;</em>&nbsp;width of about 70 km s<sup>&minus;1</sup>, which poses a challenge for the study of the typically 20&ndash;30 km s<sup>&minus;1</sup>&nbsp;velocity dispersion of the ionized gas in present-day disk galaxies. In this contribution, we present a major revision of the MaNGA data pipeline architecture, focusing particularly on a variety of factors impacting the effective LSF (e.g., under-sampling, spectral rectification, and data cube construction). Through comparison with external assessments of the MaNGA data provided by substantially higher-resolution&nbsp;<em>R</em>&nbsp;&sim;&nbsp;10,000 instruments, we demonstrate that the revised MPL-10 pipeline measures the instrumental LSF sufficiently accurately (&le;0.6% systematic, 2% random around the wavelength of H<em>&alpha;</em>) that it enables reliable measurements of astrophysical velocity dispersions&nbsp;<em>&sigma;</em><sub>H<em>&alpha;</em></sub>&nbsp;&sim;&nbsp;20 km s<sup>&minus;1</sup>&nbsp;for spaxels with emission lines detected at signal-to-noise ratio&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;50. Velocity dispersions derived from [O&nbsp;II], H<em>&beta;</em>, [O&nbsp;III], [N&nbsp;II], and [S&nbsp;II] are consistent with those derived from H<em>&alpha;</em>&nbsp;to within about 2% at&nbsp;<em>&sigma;</em><sub>H<em>&alpha;</em></sub>&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;30 km s<sup>&minus;1</sup>. Although the impact of these changes to the estimated LSF will be minimal at velocity dispersions greater than about 100 km s<sup>&minus;1</sup>, scientific results from previous data releases that are based on dispersions far below the instrumental resolution should be reevaluated.</p>