Does Kono-S Anastomosis Reduce Recurrence in Crohn’s Disease Compared with Conventional Ileocolonic Anastomosis? A Nationwide Propensity Score-matched Study from GETAID Chirurgie Group [KoCoRICCO Study]
Line Alibert, Louis Betton, Antoine Falcoz, Gilles Manceau, Stéphane Benoist, Philippe Zerbib, J. Podevin, Léon Maggiori, Antoine Brouquet, Gaëlle Tyrode, Lucine Vuitton, Déwi Vernerey, Jérémie H. Lefèvre, Zaher Lakkis
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Postoperative recurrence is a major concern in Crohn's disease. The Kono-S anastomosis has been described to reduce the rate of recurrence. However, the level of evidence for its effectiveness remains low. The KoCoRICCO study aimed to compare outcomes between Kono-S anastomosis and conventional anastomosis in two nationwide, prospective cohorts. METHODS: Adult patients with Crohn's disease, who underwent ileocolonic resection with Kono-S anastomosis, were prospectively included in seven referral centres between 2020 and 2022. Patients with conventional side-to-side anastomosis were enrolled from a previously published cohort. A propensity score analysis was performed to compare recurrence at first endoscopy in a matched 1:2 ratio population. RESULTS: A total of 433 patients with ileocolonic anastomosis were enrolled, of whom 155 had a Kono-S anastomosis. Before matching, both groups were unbalanced for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics. After matching patients with available endoscopic follow-up, endoscopic recurrence ≥i2 was found in 47.5% of the Kono-S group and 44.3% of the conventional side-to-side group [p = 0.6745]. CONCLUSIONS: The KoCoRICCO study suggests that Kono-S anastomosis does not reduce the risk of endoscopic recurrence in Crohn's disease compared with conventional side-to-side anastomosis. Further research with a longer follow-up is necessary to determine whether there is a potential benefit on surgical recurrence.