Litcius/Paper detail

Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for RNA–ligand complexes

Dejun Jiang, Hongyan Du, Huifeng Zhao, Yafeng Deng, Zhenhua Wu, Jike Wang, Yundian Zeng, Haotian Zhang, Xiaorui Wang, Ercheng Wang, Tingjun Hou, Chang‐Yu Hsieh

2024Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics26 citationsDOI

Abstract

= -0.317, rDock) offered by various docking programs. Then, the efficacy of MM/GBSA in identifying the near-native binding poses from the decoys was assessed based on 56 RNA-ligand complexes. However, it is evident that MM/GBSA has limitations in accurately predicting binding poses for RNA-ligand systems, particularly compared with notably proficient docking programs like rDock and PLANTS. The best top-1 success rate achieved by MM/GBSA rescoring is 39.3%, which falls below the best results given by docking programs (50%, PLNATS). This study represents the first evaluation of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA for RNA-ligand systems and is expected to provide valuable insights into their successful application to RNA targets.

Topics & Concepts

Molecular mechanicsAffinitiesRNAMolecular dynamicsBinding affinitiesChemistryComputational biologyContext (archaeology)Ligand (biochemistry)Implicit solvationSmall moleculeDocking (animal)SolvationComputational chemistryDrug discoveryMoleculeStereochemistryBiologyBiochemistryMedicineOrganic chemistryPaleontologyReceptorGeneNursingDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein Structure and Dynamics