Litcius/Paper detail

Outcome of pitavastatin versus atorvastatin therapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Masao Moroi, Daiji Nagayama, Fumihiko Hara, Atsuhito Saiki, Kazuhiro Shimizu, M Takahashi, Naoko Sato, Teruo Shiba, Hideki Sugimoto, Toshiki Fujioka, Tatsuo Chiba, Kosuke Nishizawa, Shuki Usui, Yasuo Iwasaki, Ichiro Tatsuno, Kaoru Sugi, Junichi Yamasaki, Shigeo Yamamura, Kohji Shirai

2020International Journal of Cardiology37 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been no report about outcome of pitavastatin versus atorvastatin therapy in high-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: Hypercholesterolemic patients with one or more risk factors for atherosclerotic diseases (n = 664, age = 65, male = 54%, diabetes = 76%, primary prevention = 74%) were randomized to receive pitavastatin 2 mg/day (n = 332) or atorvastatin 10 mg/day (n = 332). Follow-up period was 240 weeks. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, sudden death of unknown origin, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, transient ischemic attack, or heart failure requiring hospitalization. The secondary end point was a composite of the primary end point plus clinically indicated coronary revascularization for stable angina. RESULTS: The mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level at baseline was 149 mg/dL. The mean LDL-C levels at 1 year were 95 mg/dL in the pitavastatin group and 94 mg/dL in the atorvastatin group. There were no differences in LDL-C levels between both groups, however, pitavastatin significantly reduced the risk of the primary end point, compared to atorvastatin (pitavastatin = 2.9% and atorvastatin = 8.1%, HR, 0.366; 95% CI 0.170-0.787; P = 0.01 by multivariate Cox regression) as well as the risk of the secondary end point (pitavastatin = 4.5% and atorvastatin = 12.9%, HR = 0.350; 95%CI = 0.189-0.645, P = 0.001). The results for the primary and secondary end points were consistent across several prespecified subgroups. There were no differences in incidence of adverse events between the statins. CONCLUSION: Pitavastatin therapy compared with atorvastatin more may prevent cardiovascular events in hypercholesterolemic patients with one or more risk factors for atherosclerotic diseases despite similar effects on LDL-C levels.

Topics & Concepts

PitavastatinMedicineAtorvastatinInternal medicineCardiologyMyocardial infarctionStatinClinical endpointProportional hazards modelRandomized controlled trialLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism