A Total Diet Replacement Weight Management Program for Difficult-to-Treat Asthma Associated With Obesity
Varun Sharma, Helen Clare Ricketts, Louise McCombie, Naomi Brosnahan, Luisa Crawford, Lesley Slaughter, Anna Goodfellow, Femke Steffensen, Duncan S. Buchan, Rekha Chaudhuri, Michael E. J. Lean, Douglas C. Cowan
Abstract
BackgroundObesity often is associated with uncontrolled, difficult-to-treat asthma and increased morbidity and mortality. Previous studies suggest that weight loss may improve asthma outcomes, but with heterogenous asthma populations studied and unclear consensus on the optimal method of weight management. The Counterweight-Plus Programme (CWP) for weight management is an evidence-based, dietitian-led total diet replacement (TDR) program.Research QuestionCan use of the CWP compared with usual care (UC) improve asthma control and quality of life in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma and obesity?Study Design and MethodsWe conducted a 1:1 (CWP to UC) randomized, controlled single-center trial in adults with difficult-to-treat asthma and BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2. The CWP was a 12-week TDR phase (800 kcal/d low-energy formula) with stepwise food reintroduction and weight loss maintenance for up to 1 year. The primary outcome was the change in Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ6) score over 16 weeks. The secondary outcome was change in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score.ResultsThirty-five participants were randomized (36 screened) and 33 attended the 16-week follow-up (n = 17 in the CWP group, n = 16 in the UC group). Overall, mean ACQ6 score at baseline was 2.8 (95% CI, 2.4-3.1). Weight loss was greater in the CWP than UC group (mean difference, –12.1 kg; 95% CI, –16.9 to –7.4; P < .001). ACQ6 score improved more in the CWP than UC group (mean difference, –0.69; 95% CI, –1.37 to –0.01; P = .048). A larger proportion of participants achieved the minimal clinically important difference in ACQ6 score with CWP than with UC (53% vs 19%; P = .041; NNT, 3 [95% CI, 1.5-26.9]). AQLQ score improvement was greater in the CWP than UC group (mean difference, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.18-1.34; P = .013).InterpretationUsing a structured weight management program results in clinically important improvements in asthma control and quality of life over 16 weeks compared with UC in adults with difficult-to-treat asthma and obesity. This generalizable program is easy to deliver for this challenging phenotype. Longer-term outcomes continue to be studied.Trial RegistryClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03858608; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov Obesity often is associated with uncontrolled, difficult-to-treat asthma and increased morbidity and mortality. Previous studies suggest that weight loss may improve asthma outcomes, but with heterogenous asthma populations studied and unclear consensus on the optimal method of weight management. The Counterweight-Plus Programme (CWP) for weight management is an evidence-based, dietitian-led total diet replacement (TDR) program. Can use of the CWP compared with usual care (UC) improve asthma control and quality of life in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma and obesity? We conducted a 1:1 (CWP to UC) randomized, controlled single-center trial in adults with difficult-to-treat asthma and BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2. The CWP was a 12-week TDR phase (800 kcal/d low-energy formula) with stepwise food reintroduction and weight loss maintenance for up to 1 year. The primary outcome was the change in Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ6) score over 16 weeks. The secondary outcome was change in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score. Thirty-five participants were randomized (36 screened) and 33 attended the 16-week follow-up (n = 17 in the CWP group, n = 16 in the UC group). Overall, mean ACQ6 score at baseline was 2.8 (95% CI, 2.4-3.1). Weight loss was greater in the CWP than UC group (mean difference, –12.1 kg; 95% CI, –16.9 to –7.4; P < .001). ACQ6 score improved more in the CWP than UC group (mean difference, –0.69; 95% CI, –1.37 to –0.01; P = .048). A larger proportion of participants achieved the minimal clinically important difference in ACQ6 score with CWP than with UC (53% vs 19%; P = .041; NNT, 3 [95% CI, 1.5-26.9]). AQLQ score improvement was greater in the CWP than UC group (mean difference, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.18-1.34; P = .013). Using a structured weight management program results in clinically important improvements in asthma control and quality of life over 16 weeks compared with UC in adults with difficult-to-treat asthma and obesity. This generalizable program is easy to deliver for this challenging phenotype. Longer-term outcomes continue to be studied. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03858608; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov Take-home PointsStudy Question: Can use of the Counterweight-Plus Programme (CWP) for weight management improve asthma control and quality of life in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma and obesity, compared with those receiving usual care (UC)?Results: Over 16 weeks, the CWP resulted in clinically relevant improvements in both asthma control and quality-of-life indexes, with substantial weight loss, as compared with UC.Interpretation: Initial results using the CWP are encouraging, and adherence to the program was better than expected, although longer-term outcomes are awaited to assess sustainability of the benefits seen. Study Question: Can use of the Counterweight-Plus Programme (CWP) for weight management improve asthma control and quality of life in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma and obesity, compared with those receiving usual care (UC)? Results: Over 16 weeks, the CWP resulted in clinically relevant improvements in both asthma control and quality-of-life indexes, with substantial weight loss, as compared with UC. Interpretation: Initial results using the CWP are encouraging, and adherence to the program was better than expected, although longer-term outcomes are awaited to assess sustainability of the benefits seen. Approximately 17% of people living with asthma have difficult-to-treat disease because of factors including poor inhaler technique, treatment nonadherence, and comorbidities such as obesity.1Global Initiative for AsthmaDiagnosis and management of difficult-to-treat and severe asthma. 2021. 23/05/2022. Global Initiative for Asthma website.www.ginasthma.org/severeasthmaGoogle Scholar,2Global Burden of Disease 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease CollaboratorsGlobal, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.Lancet Respir Med. 2017; 5: 691-706Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1361) Google Scholar Asthma associated with obesity is less steroid responsive; is linked with poorer control, quality of life, and increased morbidity and mortality; and has limited treatment options.3Sutherland E.R. Goleva E. Strand M. et al.Body mass and glucocorticoid response in asthma.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008; 178: 682-687Crossref PubMed Scopus (254) Google Scholar,4Taylor B. Mannino D. Brown C. et al.Body mass index and asthma severity in the National Asthma Survey.Thorax. 2008; 63: 14-20Crossref PubMed Scopus (236) Google Scholar The pathophysiologic effects of obesity on asthma are multifactorial. Weight excess has direct effects on thoracic wall mechanics,5Jones R.L. Nzekwu M.M. The effects of body mass index on lung volumes.Chest. 2006; 130: 827-833Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (646) Google Scholar as well as increased airway closure,6Kaminsky D.A. Chapman D.G. Holbrook J.T. et al.Older age and obesity are associated with increased airway closure in response to methacholine in patients with asthma.Respirology. 2019; 24: 638-645Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar,7Peters U. Subramanian M. Chapman D.G. et al.BMI but not central obesity predisposes to airway closure during bronchoconstriction.Respirology. 2019; 24: 543-550Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar airway hyperresponsiveness,8Orfanos S. Jude J. Deeney B.T. et al.Obesity increases airway smooth muscle responses to contractile agonists.Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2018; 315: L673-L681Crossref Scopus (34) Google Scholar,9Pampuch A. Milewski R. Rogowska A. et al.Predictors of airway hyperreactivity in house dust mite allergic patients.Adv Respir Med. 2019; 87: 152-158Crossref Scopus (3) Google Scholar and airway inflammation.10Kwon H. Pessin J.E. Adipokines mediate inflammation and insulin resistance.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2013; 4: 71Crossref PubMed Scopus (402) Google Scholar, 11Pereira S A.-L.J. Adipokines: biological functions and metabolically healthy obese profile. J.Receptor Ligand Channel Res. 2014; 7: 15-25Crossref Scopus (17) Google Scholar, 12White S.R. Laxman B. Naureckas E.T. et al.Evidence for an IL-6-high asthma phenotype in asthmatic patients of African ancestry.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019; 144: 304-306.e4Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Google Scholar A Cochrane review13Adeniyi F.B. Young T. Weight loss interventions for chronic asthma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 7: Cd009339PubMed Google Scholar of four studies (N = 197) suggested that weight loss may improve asthma control, but the quality of the evidence was poor and further well-constructed randomized controlled trials were recommended. In the United Kingdom, the Counterweight-Plus Programme (CWP) for weight management is a commercially available dietitian-supported regimen of total diet replacement (TDR), stepwise food reintroduction, and weight loss maintenance. It has shown efficacy in obesity (mean weight loss, 10 kg; approximately one-third achieving loss of ≥ 15 kg) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (remission in 46% of patients).14Lean M. Brosnahan N. McLoone P. et al.Feasibility and indicative results from a 12-month low-energy liquid diet treatment and maintenance programme for severe obesity.Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63: e115-e124Crossref Scopus (57) Google Scholar,15Lean M.E. Leslie W.S. Barnes A.C. et al.Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial.Lancet. 2018; 391: 541-551Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (868) Google Scholar Its effects on asthma have not been evaluated, and we hypothesized that use of the CWP would result in improvements in asthma control and asthma-related quality of life. To test this hypothesis, we performed a randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept feasibility trial of CWP in patients with obesity and difficult-to-treat asthma. Herein, we report the primary outcome results for the first 16 weeks of treatment after completion of the first phase of the intervention program. In this randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel study of a TDR weight loss program compared with usual care (UC) in individuals with difficult-to-treat asthma and obesity, participants were randomized 1:1 using a password-protected, online, third-party randomization service to CWP or UC.16Sealed Envelope. Simple randomisation service. 2021. Sealed Envelope website.https://www.sealedenvelope.com/simple-randomiser/v1/Google Scholar Study visits were scheduled at baseline and 16 weeks, with further visits planned for the 1-year and 2-year follow-up. The trial was approved by the West of Scotland Regional Ethics Committee (Identifier: 18/WS/0216), was sponsored and funded by an NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Endowment Fund, and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03858608), where trial protocol is described.17National Institutes of Health Clinical CenterWeight loss for uncontrolled asthma associated with elevated BMI. NCT03858608. National Institutes of Health; 2022. 23/05/2022.https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03858608Google Scholar The funder and contributors to the fund had no input in study design or the trial outcomes. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face follow-up study visits were substituted for telephone consultations where necessary to optimize and randomization was by the Study visits and were performed by the and at the Glasgow Clinical participants to years of age with BMI of ≥ a of asthma to Global Initiative for Asthma Initiative for for asthma management and 23/05/2022. Global Initiative for Asthma Scholar and difficult-to-treat disease to and on the management of asthma. A national 23/05/2022. Scholar were from secondary and asthma and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Asthma and asthma patients to the for after a of the program. Asthma were of in the trial were to but were not in study or participants were with and were to the Glasgow Clinical where was randomization and baseline were and randomized by the asthma and and were at the Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ6) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) were The ACQ6 is a asthma control score et and of a to asthma Respir J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar a score of ≥ poor disease control, and with a minimal clinically important difference of The AQLQ is a score and quality of life in A. et a minimal important change in a Quality of Life Clin Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar A score better quality of life and the is as Respiratory J. et of Respir J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar to et of for J Respir Crit Care Med. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar test to Respiratory T. et Respiratory in chronic Respir J. 2014; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar and The CWP of TDR food reintroduction and weight loss maintenance and was by with CWP The TDR phase a low-energy liquid diet of to kcal/d and of and in a of up with by the The participants at 1 and To for or this phase was to weeks participants not 15 by a BMI to < food reintroduction was The food reintroduction phase a diet and stepwise reintroduction of of 2 to weeks were for this phase on with weight loss management. In the weight loss maintenance for weight and to weight with program were by change W.S. N. et Clinical (DiRECT): protocol for a Pract. Scopus Google Brosnahan N. H. et the intervention service of an weight management programme for severe and 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar to weight were N. Leslie et for management during weight loss maintenance in the Clinical Scopus Google Scholar asthma care was in participants in This of asthma but of asthma treatment on those with asthma treatment those with disease or of treatment efficacy participants to be at secondary asthma as of UC. participants had the for weight management healthy and in the UC inhaler technique, and asthma as at study The primary outcome was difference in change in ACQ6 score from baseline to 16 weeks the CWP and UC difference in change in AQLQ score from baseline to 16 weeks CWP and UC and in AQLQ and and the difference in proportion of participants with ≥ change in et and of a to asthma Respir J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar and A. et a minimal important change in a Quality of Life Clin Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google at 16 weeks. outcomes, To a difference of mean in ACQ6 score in CWP and UC from baseline to 16 weeks, on an of from a et and improve airway inflammation and outcomes in and obese a randomized 2013; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar a of 30 was an of a of and of A of participants was to for a visits 1 and 2 were for were as mean (95% or on and compared using or in over was using the analysis of with the baseline as a and change in using or on were as and were compared using Burden of Disease 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease CollaboratorsGlobal, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.Lancet Respir Med. 2017; 5: 691-706Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1361) Google Scholar test or the test as were performed using for were using for A P of was analysis was performed by the using were from with 2-year follow-up scheduled to in follow-up visits 2021. participants was and were patients were to follow-up and 33 patients attended 2 to be in the analysis (n = 17 in the CWP group, n = 16 in the UC group). was the of because of a than Overall, mean age was years, were were and were were including allergic and disease and or treatment was with 17% maintenance and over one-third receiving The study of those with with uncontrolled disease as by the for in the of 3 and mean ACQ6 score of 2.8 2.4-3.1). AQLQ score was weight was with a BMI of mean to of and mean to of of a and and suggested of a the (n = (n = (n = at asthma of asthma, to to score score to change after are as mean (95% or = = ACQ6 = Asthma Control Questionnaire AQLQ = Asthma Quality of Life = = CWP = Counterweight-Plus = = = = = and = = = = = = to = = = = severe asthma with UC = usual in a are as mean (95% or = = ACQ6 = Asthma Control Questionnaire AQLQ = Asthma Quality of Life = = CWP = Counterweight-Plus = = = = = and = = = = = = to = = = = severe asthma with UC = usual in the CWP group were had baseline and and were more with more and less in to compared with the UC were Over 16 weeks, mean change in ACQ6 score was to for the CWP group and to for the UC group, with a mean difference of –1.37 to –0.01; P = of Asthma Control and CWP and UC Over 16 (n = (n = CWP and UC of mean difference using analysis of with baseline as to to to to to to to to to are as mean (95% ACQ6 = Asthma Control Questionnaire AQLQ = Asthma Quality of Life CWP = Counterweight-Plus UC = usual of mean difference using analysis of with baseline as in a are as mean (95% ACQ6 = Asthma Control Questionnaire AQLQ = Asthma Quality of Life CWP = Counterweight-Plus UC = usual Over 16 weeks, mean change in AQLQ score was for the CWP group and to for the UC group, with a mean difference of 0.18-1.34; P = mean in AQLQ and the CWP group, with mean of P = P = and P = in AQLQ score was not A greater proportion of participants achieved ACQ6 score with CWP compared with UC (53% vs P = .041; = 3 [95% CI, but no were for achieving for AQLQ score or the four AQLQ were in of or or the of CWP and UC CWP and using test for or test for to to to body to to to to to to to score to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to after to to to to to to to to to are as mean (95% for or for use change from baseline of in to 16 of of = = CWP = Counterweight-Plus = = = and = = = UC = usual using test for or test for in a are as mean (95% for or for use change from baseline of in to 16 of of = = CWP = Counterweight-Plus = = = and = = = UC = usual weight loss was to for the CWP group and to for the UC group (mean difference, –12.1 kg; 95% CI, –16.9 to kg; P < with a mean total body weight loss of approximately with BMI change was to for CWP and to for UC (mean difference, to P < .001). change in score was to for CWP and for UC = were for and or of Asthma Control and Quality of Life CWP by Weight (n = (n = (n = of mean difference using analysis of to to to score to to to to to to to to to to to to to to are as mean (95% ACQ6 = Asthma Control Questionnaire AQLQ = Asthma Quality of Life CWP = Counterweight-Plus of mean difference using analysis of in a are as mean (95% ACQ6 = Asthma Control Questionnaire AQLQ = Asthma Quality of Life CWP = Counterweight-Plus the 33 participants participants not CWP participants were for weight loss was greater in the CWP group than the UC group (mean difference, kg; 95% CI, to P < with a loss of total body weight with Over 16 weeks, mean change in ACQ6 score was to for CWP and to for UC (mean difference, to P = change in AQLQ score was for CWP and to for UC (mean difference, P = .001). mean in AQLQ and CWP with mean of P = P = and P = in AQLQ score was not A greater proportion of participants achieved for ACQ6 and AQLQ with CWP compared with UC vs = vs = were for AQLQ analysis of in ACQ6 and AQLQ with CWP in on of total body weight loss and ≥ greater with greater weight to and ≥ weight loss mean ACQ6 score change was to and to and mean change in AQLQ score was to and to were for of the four AQLQ or during the Overall, participants were during the 16-week participants in the UC group with of asthma with of asthma with COVID-19 and participants in the CWP group with COVID-19 and with In this open-label, randomized, controlled we that of a total diet replacement program to patients with difficult-to-treat asthma and obesity was and to improvements in asthma control and quality of life compared with UC over 16 weeks. We clinically improvements in of CWP for ACQ6 AQLQ score and and AQLQ by total body weight loss that loss is to clinically relevant although loss of greater In CWP on and the to have important for of suggest that treatment substantial weight loss in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma and obesity is and outcomes Longer-term outcomes are awaited to benefits This program be in a primary care A of trials have the of weight loss interventions in the with asthma, with and outcomes. et et of in a program on control in obese adults with asthma. A randomized controlled J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017; PubMed Google Scholar improvements in ACQ6 and AQLQ in a randomized trial of for 3 compared with and in asthma (n = Weight loss was than in the study the studied at baseline weight and ACQ6 score the and for disease severity were not and participants were and are unclear because of the participants participants were participants had no for a study of participants screened) by et J. P. et weight loss and intervention in obese adults with asthma. A randomized PubMed Scopus Google Scholar no change in ACQ6 score or quality of life with a intervention protocol and compared with UC. weight kg) and BMI were with the although baseline control was better (mean ACQ6 were the mean weight loss was than in the trial kg) at 6 to on asthma-related outcomes. suggested improved ACQ6 score in those with weight loss of and larger effects with weight loss of et et and improve airway inflammation and outcomes in and obese a randomized 2013; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar a randomized uncontrolled parallel trial of or intervention or both over 10 weeks in participants with BMI of to and asthma. analysis mean weight loss was than in the trial and with and with improved mean ACQ6 score in the diet and and and AQLQ score in and for the and as well as a control group, the better control score better quality of life score and at baseline compared with the difficult-to-treat et S. et effects of weight loss on asthma control and quality of life in obese adults with a randomized controlled Scopus Google Scholar performed a randomized controlled trial (n = of patients with asthma and BMI of ≥ 30 UC with a dietitian-led weight loss program. improved asthma control and quality-of-life studied an asthma with the of asthma, and disease the mean Asthma Control score of a disease is well The the on et A. P. et of weight loss on in obese Physiol. 2019; Scopus Google Scholar a trial of weight loss and a in with BMI of to and to severe asthma (n = to assess the on analysis improvements in ACQ6 score and AQLQ score in those ≥ body although no change in ACQ6 score was compared with those < body The of randomization and a control group, as well as unclear of the intervention and results are This trial has This proof-of-concept feasibility study was to but a larger study is to were at baseline and although because of were to the primary and secondary outcomes we asthma control and quality-of-life are by factors such as lung and were in both that would be in both National during the COVID-19 limited for and although for primary and secondary outcomes were a proportion of would be to assess in outcomes lung and with weight management this was an trial to that may treatment This trial was conducted in a where asthma be of the substantial effects on body weight from the and as would not have been It is that participants with weight loss in the intervention group, have been more often to asthma and would a more response to the intervention than this a outcome from both and of were on and are to to in a weight loss trial are more to be to to although this would not from of the trial the and of the to CWP and UC to The studied is with difficult-to-treat asthma with an group with disease that is to Longer-term follow-up is to weight loss is and asthma-related benefits a trial with a greater is to the factors associated with treatment outcome and efficacy in the with difficult-to-treat asthma. with use of the CWP weight management program with improved asthma control and quality of life as well as and over 16 weeks in individuals with difficult-to-treat asthma and obesity. is to the longer-term outcomes and to of treatment The have to that no was for this