Diagnostic accuracy of linked colour imaging versus white light imaging for early gastric cancers: a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial study
Min Min, Xiaotian Sun, Jianying Bai, Qinsheng Zhang, Xiaocui Yang, Qiang Guo, Rong Wang, Bangmao Wang, Zhiwu Lv, Jie Pan, Chunmeng Jiang, Duanmin Hu, Bing Nong, Enqiang Linghu, Yan Liu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Linked colour imaging (LCI) is a novel new image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) technology that produces bright and vivid images. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of LCI to improve the diagnostic accuracy of early gastric cancer (EGC) relative to white light imaging (WLI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed this study on patients undergoing screening endoscopy from 12 medical institutions in China. Patients were randomly assigned to receive WLI followed by LCI or LCI followed by WLI. The primary outcome was to compared the diagnostic accuracy between LCI and WLI for EGC/high-grade intraepithelial neoplasms. Secondary outcomes included the numbers of suspicious lesions, neoplastic lesions and examination time by using LCI detected versus using WLI. RESULTS: = .019). CONCLUSIONS: LCI has better accuracy and shorter examination time in diagnosing EGC than WLI (Clinical trial registration: NCT03092414).Key messagesCompared with white light imaging (WLI), the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity increased by using LCI.More lesions were detected by LCI alone than by WLI alone, especially among differentiated EGC.LCI may be used as a screening tool for routine clinical observation.