Litcius/Paper detail

Interleukin‐27 as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Patients with Sepsis: A Meta‐Analysis

Ying Wang, Jingyi Zhao, Yinhui Yao, Dan Zhao, Shiquan Liu

2021BioMed Research International16 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Background . The present study was aimed to investigate the value of blood interleukin‐27 (IL‐27) as a diagnostic biomarker of sepsis. Methods . We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the reference lists of relevant articles. All studies published up to October 21, 2020, which evaluated the accuracy of IL‐27 levels for the diagnosis of sepsis were included. All the selected papers were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 (QUADAS‐2). We used a bivariate random effects model to estimate sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC). Deeks’ funnel plot was used to illustrate the potential presence of publication bias. Results . This meta‐analysis included seven articles. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.72‐0.93), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.42‐0.90), and 15 (95% CI, 3‐72), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84‐0.90). The pooled I 2 statistic was 96.05 for the sensitivity and 96.65 for the specificity in the heterogeneity analysis. Deeks’ funnel plot indicated no publication bias in this meta‐analysis ( P = 0.07). Conclusions . The present results showed that IL‐27 is a reliable diagnostic biomarker of sepsis, but it should be investigated in combination with other clinical tests and results.

Topics & Concepts

Funnel plotDiagnostic odds ratioMeta-analysisMedicinePublication biasReceiver operating characteristicBiomarkerCochrane LibraryArea under the curveInternal medicineSepsisDiagnostic accuracyBiochemistryChemistryPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentImmune Response and Inflammation
Interleukin‐27 as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Patients with Sepsis: A Meta‐Analysis | Litcius