Litcius/Paper detail

The effect of spray‐dried porcine plasma on gilthead seabream (<i>Sparus aurata</i>) intestinal microbiota

Silvana Tapia‐Paniagua, M. Carmen Balebona, Joana P. Firmino, Carmen Rodríguez, Javier Polo, Miguel Ángel Moríñigo, Enric Gisbert

2020Aquaculture Nutrition20 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The effect of spray-dried porcine plasma (SDPP) on the intestinal histological organization and autochthonous microbiota composition was evaluated in Sparus aurata. Fish were fed a basal diet (51 g/kg protein, 17 g/kg fat, 20.6 MJ/kg gross energy) and a diet containing 3 g/kg SDPP for 95 days (initial body weight, BW = 9.5 ± 0.2g, mean ± SD). The inclusion of SDPP promoted growth (p < .05), being fish fed the SDPP diet 6.2% (BW = 88.2 ± 1.6 g) heavier than the control (BW = 82.7 ± 3.2 g). SDPP increased the density of intestinal goblet cells (p < .05), whereas no differences in villi height were found (p > .05) between both groups. Intestinal microbiota was dominated by Proteobacteria (>85%) and Firmicutes (5%–12%), whereas Bacteroidetes never represented more than 1.5%. γ-Proteobacteria, and Bacilli and Clostridia were the predominant classes. The short administration of SDPP (20 days) resulted in changes in microbiota diversity and richness associated with an increase in the sequences of the genus Lactobacillus and to a decrease in the genus Vibrio, whereas these changes were reverted at 95 days. Intestinal goblet cell density was not correlated to microbiota diversity and richness changes rather than to the immunostimulatory effect of the SDPP.

Topics & Concepts

BiologyBacteroidetesFirmicutesProteobacteriaClostridiaLactobacillusFood scienceMicrobiologyAnimal scienceBacteriaFermentation16S ribosomal RNAGeneticsAquaculture disease management and microbiotaAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthAquatic life and conservation
The effect of spray‐dried porcine plasma on gilthead seabream (<i>Sparus aurata</i>) intestinal microbiota | Litcius