Prolonged PR interval and incidence of atrial fibrillation, heart failure admissions, and mortality in patients with implanted cardiac devices: A real-world survey
Hirad Yarmohammadi, Elaine Y. Wan, Angelo Biviano, Hasan Garan, Jodi Koehler, Robert Stadler
Abstract
BackgroundProlongation of the PR interval has long been considered a benign condition, particularly in the setting of nonstructural heart disease.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of PR interval on various well-adjudicated cardiovascular outcomes using a large real-world population data of patients with implanted dual-chamber permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.MethodsPR intervals were measured during remote transmissions in patients with implanted permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Study endpoints (time to the first occurrence of AF, heart failure hospitalization [HFH], or death) were obtained between January 2007 and June 2019 from the deidentified Optum de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset.ResultsA total of 25,752 patients (age 69.3 ± 13.9 years; 58% male) were evaluated. The average intrinsic PR interval was 185 ± 55 ms. In the subset of 16,730 patients with available long-term device diagnostic data, a total of 2555 (15.3%) individuals developed AF during 2.59 ± 2.18 years of follow-up. The incidence of AF was significantly higher (up to 30%) in patients with a longer PR interval (ie, PR interval ≥270 ms; P < .05). Time-to-event survival analysis and multivariable analysis showed that PR interval ≥190 ms was significantly associated with higher incidence of AF, HFH, or HFH or death when compared with shorter PR intervals (P < .05 for all 3 parameters).ConclusionIn a large real-world population of patients with implanted devices, PR interval prolongation was significantly associated with increased incidence of AF, HFH, or death. Prolongation of the PR interval has long been considered a benign condition, particularly in the setting of nonstructural heart disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of PR interval on various well-adjudicated cardiovascular outcomes using a large real-world population data of patients with implanted dual-chamber permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. PR intervals were measured during remote transmissions in patients with implanted permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Study endpoints (time to the first occurrence of AF, heart failure hospitalization [HFH], or death) were obtained between January 2007 and June 2019 from the deidentified Optum de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset. A total of 25,752 patients (age 69.3 ± 13.9 years; 58% male) were evaluated. The average intrinsic PR interval was 185 ± 55 ms. In the subset of 16,730 patients with available long-term device diagnostic data, a total of 2555 (15.3%) individuals developed AF during 2.59 ± 2.18 years of follow-up. The incidence of AF was significantly higher (up to 30%) in patients with a longer PR interval (ie, PR interval ≥270 ms; P < .05). Time-to-event survival analysis and multivariable analysis showed that PR interval ≥190 ms was significantly associated with higher incidence of AF, HFH, or HFH or death when compared with shorter PR intervals (P < .05 for all 3 parameters). In a large real-world population of patients with implanted devices, PR interval prolongation was significantly associated with increased incidence of AF, HFH, or death.