Assessment of laboratory capacity in conflict-affected low-resource settings using two World Health Organization laboratory assessment tools
Jessica Markby, Monika Gygax, Catherine Savoy, Yves Giebens, Sanja Janjanin, Felicity Machoka, Justin Kinziagu Mawina, Sahar M.M. Ghanem, Beatrice Vetter
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Laboratory diagnostic services are essential to drive evidence-based treatment decisions, manage outbreaks, and provide population-level data. Many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) lack sufficient diagnostic capacity, often further exacerbated in conflict-affected areas. This project assessed laboratory services in conflict-affected LMICs to understand gaps and opportunities for improving laboratory capacity. METHODS: The World Health Organization Laboratory Assessment Tool Facility Questionnaire (WHO Laboratory Tool) and Stepwise Laboratory Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist were used to assess five laboratories in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and five in Gaza, Palestine. Total scores and percentage outcomes by indicator were calculated. RESULTS: Average WHO Laboratory Tool score across all facilities was 41% (range 32-50%) in DRC and 78% (range 72-84%) in Gaza. Lowest scoring indicators in DRC were Biorisk management (13%, range 8-21%), Documentation (14%, range 6-21%), and in Gaza, were Facilities (59%, range 46-75%) and Documentation (60%, range 44-76%). Highest scoring indicators in DRC were Facilities (70%, range 45-83%) and Data and Information Management (61%, range 38-80%), and in Gaza were Data Information and Management (96%) and Public Health Function (91%, range 88-94%). In DRC, no laboratory achieved a SLIPTA star rating. In Gaza, two laboratories had a 3-star SLIPTA rating, one had a 2-star rating and two had a 1-star rating. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory systems in conflict-affected LMICs have significant gaps. Implementating improvement strategies in such settings may be especially challenging.