Litcius/Paper detail

Acceptability of 3D‐printed breast models and their impact on the decisional conflict of breast cancer patients: A feasibility study

Lumarie Santiago, Robert J. Volk, Cristina M. Checka, Dalliah Black, Joanna Lee, Jessica Suarez Colen, Catherine L. Akay, Abigail S. Caudle, Henry M. Kuerer, Elsa Arribas

2021Journal of Surgical Oncology20 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the acceptability and impact of 3D-printed breast models (3D-BMs) on treatment-related decisional conflict (DC) of breast cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer were accrued in a prospective institutional review board-approved trial. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A personalized 3D-BM was derived from MRI. DC was evaluated pre- and post-3D-BM review. 3D-BM acceptability was assessed post-3D-BM review. RESULTS: DC surveys before and after 3D-BM review and 3D-BM acceptability surveys were completed by 25 patients. 3D-BM were generated in two patients with bilateral breast cancer. The mean patient age was 48.8 years (28-72). The tumor stage was Tis (7), 1 (8), 2 (8), and 3 (4). The nodal staging was 0 (19), 1 (7), and 3 (1). Tumors were unifocal (15), multifocal (8), or multicentric (4). Patients underwent mastectomy (13) and segmental mastectomy (14) with (20) or without (7) oncoplastic intervention. Neoadjuvant therapy was given to seven patients. Patients rated the acceptability of the 3D-BM as good/excellent in understanding their condition (24/24), understanding disease size (25/25), 3D-BM detail (22/25), understanding their surgical options (24/25), encouraging to ask questions (23/25), 3D-BM size (24/25), and impartial to surgical options (17/24). There was a significant reduction in the overall DC post-3D-BM review, indicating patients became more assured of their treatment choice (p = 0.002). Reduction post-3D-BM review was also observed in the uncertainty (p = 0.012), feeling informed about options (p = 0.005), clarity about values (p = 0.032), and effective (p = 0.002) Decisional Conflict Scale subscales. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-BMs are an acceptable tool to decrease DC in breast cancer patients.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineBreast cancerMastectomyMagnetic resonance imagingOncoplastic SurgeryInstitutional review boardBreast-conserving surgeryStage (stratigraphy)CancerRadiologyOncologyInternal medicineSurgeryBiologyPaleontologyBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesBreast Implant and ReconstructionAnatomy and Medical Technology
Acceptability of 3D‐printed breast models and their impact on the decisional conflict of breast cancer patients: A feasibility study | Litcius