Litcius/Paper detail

Approval Voting and Incentives in Crowdsourcing

Nihar B. Shah

2020ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation28 citationsDOI

Abstract

The growing need for labeled training data has made crowdsourcing an important part of machine learning. The quality of crowdsourced labels is, however, adversely affected by three factors: (1) the workers are not experts; (2) the incentives of the workers are not aligned with those of the requesters; and (3) the interface does not allow workers to convey their knowledge accurately, by forcing them to make a single choice among a set of options. In this paper, we address these issues by introducing approval voting to %judiciously utilize the expertise of workers who have partial knowledge of the true answer, and coupling it with a ("strictly proper") incentive-compatible compensation mechanism. We show rigorous theoretical guarantees of optimality of our mechanism together with a simple axiomatic characterization. We also conduct preliminary empirical studies on Amazon Mechanical Turk which validate our approach.

Topics & Concepts

CrowdsourcingIncentiveVotingComputer scienceForcing (mathematics)AxiomMajority ruleSet (abstract data type)Mechanism (biology)Compensation (psychology)Quality (philosophy)Data scienceKnowledge managementMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMicroeconomicsWorld Wide WebEconomicsPolitical sciencePsychologyPsychoanalysisEpistemologyProgramming languageGeometryClimatologyGeologyLawPhilosophyPoliticsMathematicsMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingAuction Theory and ApplicationsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Approval Voting and Incentives in Crowdsourcing | Litcius