Retrospective real‐world comparative effectiveness of ovine forestomach matrix and collagen/ <scp>ORC</scp> in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers
Brandon A. Bosque, Christopher Frampton, Abigail E. Chaffin, Gregory Bohn, Kevin Woo, Candace DeLeonardis, Brian Lepow, M. Mark Melin, Tobe Madu, Shane G. Dowling, Barnaby C. H. May
Abstract
The retrospective pragmatic real-world data (RWD) study compared the healing outcomes of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) treated with either ovine forestomach matrix (OFM) (n = 1150) or collagen/oxidised regenerated cellulose (ORC) (n = 1072) in out-patient wound care centres. Median time to wound closure was significantly (P = .0015) faster in the OFM group (14.6 ± 0.5 weeks) relative to the collagen/ORC group (16.4 ± 0.7). A sub-group analysis was performed to understand the relative efficacy in DFUs requiring longer periods of treatment and showed that DFUs treated with OFM healed up to 5.3 weeks faster in these challenging wounds. The percentage of wounds closed at 36 weeks was significantly improved in OFM treated DFUs relative to the collagen/ORC. A Cox proportional hazards analysis showed OFM-treated wounds had a 18% greater probability of healing versus wounds managed with collagen/ORC, and the probability increased to 21% when the analysis was adjusted for multiple variables. This study represents the first large retrospective RWD analysis comparing OFM and collagen/ORC and supports the clinical efficacy of OFM in the treatment of DFUs.