Litcius/Paper detail

Why is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures in Visuolinguistic Compositionality

Anuj Diwan, Layne Berry, Eunsol Choi, David Harwath, Kyle Mahowald

202215 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Recent visuolinguistic pre-trained models show promising progress on various end tasks such as image retrieval and video captioning. Yet, they fail miserably on the recently proposed Winoground dataset, which challenges models to match paired images and English captions, with items constructed to overlap lexically but differ in meaning (e.g., "there is a mug in some grass" vs. "there is some grass in a mug"). By annotating the dataset using new fine-grained tags, we show that solving the Winoground task requires not just compositional language understanding, but a host of other abilities like commonsense reasoning or locating small, out-of-focus objects in low-resolution images. In this paper, we identify the dataset's main challenges through a suite of experiments on related tasks (probing task, image retrieval task), data augmentation, and manual inspection of the dataset. Our analysis suggests that a main challenge in visuolinguistic models may lie in fusing visual and textual representations, rather than in compositional language understanding. We release our annotation and code at https://github.com/ajd12342/why-winoground-hard.

Topics & Concepts

Computer scienceClosed captioningPrinciple of compositionalityTask (project management)Natural language processingFocus (optics)Artificial intelligenceSuiteCode (set theory)Information retrievalImage (mathematics)Programming languagePhysicsOpticsSet (abstract data type)ManagementHistoryEconomicsArchaeologyMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesNatural Language Processing Techniques
Why is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures in Visuolinguistic Compositionality | Litcius