The Associations of Hearing Sensitivity and Different Cognitive Functions with Perception of Speech-in-Noise
Natascha Merten, Meta M. Boenniger, Sibylle C. Herholz, Monique M.B. Breteler
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Impaired speech-in-noise perception affects individuals' daily lives and is a frequent symptom of age-related hearing loss, which is a common disabling condition and a health concern in aging populations. The relative impact of hearing sensitivity loss and different cognitive functions on speech-in-noise perception is not well understood. We aimed to assess to what extent hearing sensitivity and different cognitive functions were associated with sentence-in-noise performance across the adult lifespan. DESIGN: This study is based on data of 2585 participants of the Rhineland Study, which is a German community-based cohort study of persons of age 30 years and older. We assessed speech-in-noise with a sentence-in-noise test (Göttinger Satztest), hearing sensitivity thresholds (air conduction pure-tone audiometry [PTA] average of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz), and the following cognitive domains: crystallized intelligence (German Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest, MWT-B), executive functioning (Trail Making Test B, TMT), working memory (Digit Span forward, DS), and long-term memory (Verbal Learning and Memory Test delayed recall; VLMT). We examined the association between hearing sensitivity and cognitive functions with sentence-in-noise perception using a multivariable linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, and multiple potential confounders. RESULTS: Better hearing sensitivity was associated with better speech-in-noise perception (0.25 signal noise ratio [SNR] dB HL decrease per 5 dB HL decrease in PTA; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20 to 0.25; p < 0.001). Better cognitive performance was also associated with better speech-in-noise perception, but to a lesser extent. Crystallized intelligence (MWT-B) showed an effect size of -0.10 SNR dB HL decrease per SD (95% CI: -0.14 to -0.06; p < 0.001), executive functioning (TMT) of -0.08 SNR dB HL decrease per SD (95% CI: -0.13 to -0.03; p = 0.002), working memory (DS) of -0.04 SNR dB HL decrease per SD (95% CI: -0.08 to -0.003; p = 0.03), and long-term memory (VLMT) of -0.03 SNR dB HL decrease per SD (95% CI: -0.07 to 0.01; p = 0.12). The standardized effect of hearing sensitivity (ß = 0.34) on speech-in-noise perception was four to five times larger than the effects of crystallized intelligence (ß = -0.08) and executive functioning (ß = -0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Hearing sensitivity was the strongest determinant of sentence-in-noise perception in adults above the age of 30. We determined the relative effect of different cognitive functions on sentence-in-noise perception. Crystallized intelligence and executive functions showed stronger associations while working and long-term memory functions had much smaller independent effects. Our results contribute to the understanding of determinants of speech-in-noise perception in aging adults.