Litcius/Paper detail

Women and atrial fibrillation

Annabelle Santos Volgman, Emelia J. Benjamin, Anne B. Curtis, Margaret C. Fang, Kathryn J. Lindley, Gerald V. Naccarelli, Carl J. Pepine, Odayme Quesada, Marmar Vaseghi, Albert L. Waldo, Nanette K. Wenger, Andrea M. Russo

2020Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology94 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a growing problem in the United States and worldwide, imposing a high individual and health system burden, including increased resource consumption due to repeated hospitalizations, stroke, dementia, heart failure, and death. This comprehensive review summarizes the most recent data on sex-related differences in risks associated with AF. Women with AF have increased risk of stroke and death compared to men, and possible reasons for this disparity are explored. Women also continue to have worse symptoms and quality of life, and poorer outcomes with stroke prevention, as well as with rate and rhythm control management strategies. Many current rhythm control treatment strategies for AF, including cardioversion and ablation, are used less frequently in women as compared to men, whereas women are more likely to be treated with rate control strategies or antiarrhythmic drugs. Sex differences should be considered in treating women with AF to improve outcomes and women and men should be offered the same interventions for AF. We need to improve the evidence base to understand if variation in utilization of rate and rhythm control management between men and women represents health inequities or appropriate clinical judgement.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineAtrial fibrillationStroke (engine)CardioversionPsychological interventionQuality of life (healthcare)Intensive care medicineInternal medicinePsychiatryNursingMechanical engineeringEngineeringAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Women and atrial fibrillation | Litcius