Adopting a toxic unit model paradigm in design, analysis and interpretation of oil toxicity testing
Thomas F. Parkerton, Deborah French-McCay, Benjamin de Jourdan, Kenneth Lee, Gina Coelho
Abstract
The lack of a conceptual understanding and unifying quantitative framework to guide conduct and interpretation of laboratory oil toxicity tests, has led investigators to divergent conclusions that can confuse stakeholders and impede sound decision-making. While a plethora of oil toxicity studies are available and continue to be published, due to differences in experimental design, results between studies often cannot be compared. Furthermore, much resulting data fails to advance quantitative effect models that are critically needed for oil spill risk and impact assessments. This paper discusses the challenges posed when evaluating oil toxicity test data based on traditional, total concentration-based exposure metrics and offers solutions for improving the state of practice by adopting a unifying toxic unit (TU) model framework. Key advantages of a TU framework is that differences in test oil composition, sensitivity of the test organism/endpoint, and toxicity test design (i.e., type of test) can be taken into quantitative account in predicting aquatic toxicity. This paradigm shift is intended to bridge the utility of laboratory oil toxicity tests with improved assessment of effects in the field. To illustrate these advantages, results from literature studies are reassessed and contrasted with conclusions obtained based on past practice. Using instructive examples, model results are presented to explain how dissolved oil composition and concentrations and resulting TUs vary in WAFs prepared using variable loading or dilution test designs and the important role that unmeasured oil components contribute to predicted oil toxicity. Model results are used to highlight how the TU framework can serve as a valuable aid in designing and interpreting empirical toxicity tests and provide the data required to validate/refine predictive toxicity models. To further promote consistent exposure and hazard assessment of physically and chemically dispersed oil toxicity tests recommendations for advancing the TU framework are presented.