Litcius/Paper detail

Encorafenib, cetuximab and chemotherapy in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial

Scott Kopetz, Takayuki Yoshino, Eric Van Cutsem, Cathy Eng, Tae Won Kim, Harpreet Wasan, Jayesh Desai, Fortunato Ciardiello, Rona Yaeger, Tim Maughan, Elena Beyzarov, Xiaoxi Zhang, Graham Ferrier, Xiaosong Zhang, Josep Tabernero

2025Nature Medicine101 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Encorafenib + cetuximab (EC) is approved for previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on the BEACON phase 3 study. Historically, first-line treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC with chemotherapy regimens has had limited efficacy. The phase 3 BREAKWATER study investigated EC+mFOLFOX6 versus standard of care (SOC) in patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E mCRC. The dual primary endpoint of progression-free survival is event driven; data were not mature at data cutoff. BREAKWATER met the other dual primary endpoint of objective response rate, demonstrating significant and clinically relevant improvement in objective response rate (EC+mFOLFOX6: 60.9%; SOC: 40.0%; odds ratio, 2.443; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.403-4.253; 99.8% CI: 1.019-5.855; one-sided P = 0.0008). Median duration of response was 13.9 versus 11.1 months. At this first interim analysis of overall survival, the hazard ratio was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.318-0.691; repeated CI: 0.166-1.322). Serious adverse event rates were 37.7% versus 34.6%. The safety profiles were consistent with those known for each agent. BREAKWATER demonstrated a significantly improved response rate that was durable for first-line EC+mFOLFOX6 versus SOC in patients with BRAF V600E mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04607421 .

Topics & Concepts

MedicineHazard ratioCetuximabClinical endpointInternal medicineOncologyColorectal cancerConfidence intervalAdverse effectOdds ratioCancerRandomized controlled trialColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysGenetic factors in colorectal cancer