Litcius/Paper detail

Circular economy: comparative life cycle assessment of fossil polyethylene terephthalate (PET)and its recycled and bio-based counterparts

Magdalena Rybaczewska-Błażejowska, Ángel Isidro Mena Nieto

2020Management and Production Engineering Review24 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The transition to circular economy requires diversifying material sources, improving secondary raw materials management, including recycling, and finally finding sustainable alternative materials. Both recycled and bio-based plastics are often regarded as promising alternatives to conventional fossil-based plastics. Their broad application instead of fossilbased plastics is, however, frequently the subject of criticism because of offering limited environmental benefits. The study presents a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of fossil-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) versus its recycled and bio-based counterparts. The system boundary covers the plastics manufacturing and end-of-life plastic management stages (cradle-to-cradle/grave variant). Based on the data and assumptions set out in the research, recycled PET (rPET) demonstrates the best environmental profile out of the evaluated plastics in all impact categories. The study contributes to circular economy in plastics by providing transparent and consistent knowledge on their environmental portfolio.

Topics & Concepts

Polyethylene terephthalateCircular economyLife-cycle assessmentBusinessWaste managementMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceProduction (economics)EconomicsEngineeringComposite materialBiologyEcologyMicroeconomicsMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Circular economy: comparative life cycle assessment of fossil polyethylene terephthalate (PET)and its recycled and bio-based counterparts | Litcius