Litcius/Paper detail

Cross-border Effects of Capacity Remuneration Mechanisms: The Swiss Case

Florian Zimmermann, Andreas Bublitz, Dogan Keles, Wolf Fïchtner

2020The Energy Journal19 citationsDOI

Abstract

In this article, cross-border effects of different market design options are analyzed using Switzerland, which is strongly interconnected to larger neighboring markets, as a case study. An investigation is conducted with an agent-based model where in one scenario, all market designs are represented according to the current legislation, and in another, energy-only markets (EOM) are assumed in all considered countries. The results show that wholesale electricity prices are highly dependent on the chosen market design and in the annual average are up to 27% higher in the EOM scenario. Due to expected larger interconnector capacities, this increase is evident in all simulated markets. Furthermore, the results indicate that the planned market design changes in the neighboring countries decrease investments in Switzerland. However, generation adequacy is still guaranteed due to the high Swiss hydropower storage capacity. Our results suggest that, under the current circumstances, a domestic mechanism in Switzerland is not required.

Topics & Concepts

RemunerationElectricityElectricity marketLegislationHydropowerBusinessEnergy marketEconomicsFinanceEngineeringPolitical scienceElectrical engineeringLawElectric Power System OptimizationSmart Grid Energy ManagementMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Cross-border Effects of Capacity Remuneration Mechanisms: The Swiss Case | Litcius