Using Randomization Tests to Address Disruptions in Clinical Trials: A Report from the NISS Ingram Olkin Forum Series on Unplanned Clinical Trial Disruptions
Diane Uschner, Oleksandr Sverdlov, Kerstine Carter, Jonathan Chipman, Olga Kuznetsova, Jone Renteria, Adam Lane, Chris Barker, Nancy L. Geller, Michael A. Proschan, Martin Posch, Sergey Tarima, Frank Bretz, William F. Rosenberger
Abstract
1. AbstractRecent examples for unplanned external events are the global COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine, or most recently Hurricane Ian in Puerto Rico. Disruptions due to unplanned external events can lead to violation of assumptions in clinical trials. In certain situations, randomization tests can provide non-parametric inference that is robust to violation of the assumptions usually made in clinical trials. The ICH E9 (R1) Addendum on estimands and sensitivity analyses provides a guideline for aligning the trial objectives with strategies to address disruptions in clinical trials. In this paper, we embed randomization tests within the estimand framework to allow for inference following disruptions in clinical trials in a way that reflects recent literature. A stylized clinical trial is presented to illustrate the method, and a simulation study highlights situations when a randomization test that is conducted under the intention-to-treat principle can provide unbiased results.