The relevance of NMDA receptor antibody-specific index for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis
Martin W. Hümmert, Konstantin Fritz Jendretzky, Karin Fricke, Marina Gingele, Dominica Ratuszny, Nora Möhn, Corinna Trebst, Thomas Skripuletz, Stefan Gingele, Kurt‐Wolfram Sühs
Abstract
Abstract The clinical implications of the presence of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-specific intrathecal immunoglobulin G synthesis and whether it determines the diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis have not been thoroughly investigated yet. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the detection of intrathecal anti-NMDAR-specific IgG synthesis contributes to the diagnostic confirmation of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, to disease severity, and to prognosis in patients with positive serum anti-NMDAR-IgG. In this study, patients with detectable anti-NMDAR IgG in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were included and separated into two groups that either met the 2016 criteria by Graus et al . of definite anti-NMDAR encephalitis (n = 27) or did not (n = 15). In a total, of 80 paired CSF/serum samples, antibody titers were titrated manually and end-point titer levels were carefully determined in a blinded manner to the subgroup attribution. The disease course was assessed via the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and prognosis was estimated by the anti-NMDAR Encephalitis One-Year Functional Status (NEOS) score. With respect to whether the diagnostic Graus criteria for definite anti-NMDAR encephalitis were fulfilled, a significantly unequal distribution of intrathecal anti-NMDAR antibody-specific synthesis could be shown with a high negative predictive value in case of a negative anti-NMDAR antibody-specific index (NMDAR AI, p = .008. OR = 23.9, sensitivity = 1.0, specificity = 0.4, negative predictive value = 1). A weak correlation was found between the CSF antibody titer and mRS value at the time of sample collection ( r s = .37, p = .008, 95% CI [.09, .59]). During the disease course a higher delta-mRS value formed of the mRS at initial presentation minus that at the last recorded presentation correlated with a higher NMDAR AI at first lumbar puncture ( r s = − .56, p = .017, 95% CI [− .83, − .11]). No association with the prognostic NEOS score was found. In conclusion, a negative antibody-specific index for anti-NMDAR IgG antibodies has a highly negative predictive value for the diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Yet, a positive NMDAR AI alone does not allow the diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis.