Evolutionary contingency in lingulid brachiopods across mass extinctions
Yue Liang, Luke C. Strotz, Timothy P. Topper, Lars E. Holmer, Graham E. Budd, Yanlong Chen, Ruisen Fang, Yazhou Hu, Zhifei Zhang
Abstract
Morphology usually serves as an effective proxy for functional ecology,1Stanley S.M. Relation of Shell Form to Life Habits of the Bivalvia (Mollusca). Geological Society of America, 1970Crossref Scopus (525) Google Scholar,2Simpson G.G. Tempo and Mode in Evolution. Columbia University Press, 1944Google Scholar,3Grossnickle D.M. Newham E. Therian mammals experience an ecomorphological radiation during the Late Cretaceous and selective extinction at the K-Pg boundary.Proc. R. Soc. B. 2016; 283: 20160256Crossref Scopus (56) Google Scholar,4Novack-Gottshall P.M. Sultan A. Smith N.S. Purcell J. Hanson K.E. Lively R. Ranjha I. Collins C. Parker R. Sumrall C.D. Deline B. Morphological volatility precedes ecological innovation in early echinoderms.Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2022; 6: 263-272Crossref PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar,5Cole S.R. Hopkins M.J. Selectivity and the effect of mass extinctions on disparity and functional ecology.Sci. Adv. 2021; 7: eabf4072Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar and evaluating morphological, anatomical, and ecological changes permits a deeper understanding of the nature of diversification and macroevolution.5Cole S.R. Hopkins M.J. Selectivity and the effect of mass extinctions on disparity and functional ecology.Sci. Adv. 2021; 7: eabf4072Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar,6Gould S.J. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. W.W. Norton & Company, 1989Google Scholar,7Foote M. Discordance and concordance between morphological and taxonomic diversity.Paleobiology. 1993; 19: 185-204Crossref Scopus (270) Google Scholar,8Jablonski D. Lessons from the past: evolutionary impacts of mass extinctions.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001; 98: 5393-5398Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar,9Erwin D.H. Disparity: morphological pattern and developmental context.Palaeontology. 2007; 50: 57-73Crossref Scopus (258) Google Scholar,10Hughes M. Gerber S. Wills M.A. Clades reach highest morphological disparity early in their evolution.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013; 110: 13875-13879Crossref PubMed Scopus (153) Google Scholar,11Deline B. Greenwood J.M. Clark J.W. Puttick M.N. Peterson K.J. Donoghue P.C.J. Evolution of metazoan morphological disparity.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018; 115: E8909-E8918Crossref PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar,12Budd G.E. Morphospace.Curr. Biol. 2021; 31: R1181-R1185Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar Lingulid (order Lingulida) brachiopods are both diverse and abundant during the early Palaeozoic but decrease in diversity over time, with only a few genera of linguloids and discinoids present in modern marine ecosystems, resulting in them frequently being referred to as “living fossils.”13Holmer L.E. Popov L.E. Lingulata.in: Kaesler R.L. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. 2. Geological Society of America & University of Kansas Press, 2000: 30-146Google Scholar,14Carlson S.J. The evolution of Brachiopoda.Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2016; 44: 409-438Crossref Scopus (71) Google Scholar,15Peng Y. Shi G.R. Gao Y. He W. Shen S. How and why did the Lingulidae (Brachiopoda) not only survive the end-Permian mass extinction but also thrive in its aftermath?.Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2007; 252: 118-131Crossref Scopus (43) Google Scholar The dynamics that drove this decline remain uncertain, and it has not been determined if there is an associated decline in morphological and ecological diversity. Here, we apply geometric morphometrics to reconstruct global morphospace occupation for lingulid brachiopods through the Phanerozoic, with results showing that maximum morphospace occupation was reached by the Early Ordovician. At this time of peak diversity, linguloids with a sub-rectangular shell shape already possessed several evolutionary features, such as the rearrangement of mantle canals and reduction of the pseudointerarea, common to all modern infaunal forms. The end Ordovician mass extinction has a differential effect on linguloids, disproportionally wiping out those forms with a rounded shell shape, while forms with sub-rectangular shells survived both the end Ordovician and the Permian-Triassic mass extinctions, leaving a fauna predominantly composed of infaunal forms. For discinoids, both morphospace occupation and epibenthic life strategies remain consistent through the Phanerozoic. Morphospace occupation over time, when considered using anatomical and ecological analyses, suggests that the limited morphological and ecological diversity of modern lingulid brachiopods reflects evolutionary contingency rather than deterministic processes.