Litcius/Paper detail

Structural genomics and the Protein Data Bank

K. Michalska, A. Joachimiak

2021Journal of Biological Chemistry19 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The field of Structural Genomics arose over the last 3 decades to address a large and rapidly growing divergence between microbial genomic, functional, and structural data. Several international programs took advantage of the vast genomic sequence information and evaluated the feasibility of structure determination for expanded and newly discovered protein families. As a consequence, structural genomics has developed structure-determination pipelines and applied them to a wide range of novel, uncharacterized proteins, often from “microbial dark matter,” and later to proteins from human pathogens. Advances were especially needed in protein production and rapid de novo structure solution. The experimental three-dimensional models were promptly made public, facilitating structure determination of other members of the family and helping to understand their molecular and biochemical functions. Improvements in experimental methods and databases resulted in fast progress in molecular and structural biology. The Protein Data Bank structure repository played a central role in the coordination of structural genomics efforts and the structural biology community as a whole. It facilitated development of standards and validation tools essential for maintaining high quality of deposited structural data. The field of Structural Genomics arose over the last 3 decades to address a large and rapidly growing divergence between microbial genomic, functional, and structural data. Several international programs took advantage of the vast genomic sequence information and evaluated the feasibility of structure determination for expanded and newly discovered protein families. As a consequence, structural genomics has developed structure-determination pipelines and applied them to a wide range of novel, uncharacterized proteins, often from “microbial dark matter,” and later to proteins from human pathogens. Advances were especially needed in protein production and rapid de novo structure solution. The experimental three-dimensional models were promptly made public, facilitating structure determination of other members of the family and helping to understand their molecular and biochemical functions. Improvements in experimental methods and databases resulted in fast progress in molecular and structural biology. The Protein Data Bank structure repository played a central role in the coordination of structural genomics efforts and the structural biology community as a whole. It facilitated development of standards and validation tools essential for maintaining high quality of deposited structural data. The concept of Structural Genomics (SG) was born as a result of exponential progress in genome sequencing. The fast growth of DNA sequence information in the 1990s led to the generation of huge amounts of genomic data, which was accompanied by significant knowledge gaps in our understanding of biological roles and biochemical functions encoded in the genomes. Of importance, the sequence information bore little insights about the proteins (often called hypothetical) these newly discovered genes programmed, hampering progress toward functional interpretation. Massive accumulation of genomic and metagenomic sequences posed many questions that could not simply be neglected or ignored. To address these new challenges, the National Institutes of Health, Department of Energy, RIKEN, Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and other numerous government and private agencies around the world funded structural genomics programs as early as 1997 to 2000. Table 1 summarizes the contribution of larger SG programs to determination of protein structures.Table 1Top 20 structural genomics programsCenterNumber of PDB depositsOrigin and fundingTechniques usedRIKEN Structural Genomics/Proteomics Initiative2746Japan, government, National Project on Protein Structural and Functional AnalysesNMR, X-rayMidwest Center for Structural Genomics1955USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-ray, NMRStructural Genomics Consortium1896International/a public–private partnershipX-ray, NMRJoint Center for Structural Genomics1601USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-ray, NMRCenter for Structural Genomics of Infectious Diseases1359USA, NIH/NIAIDX-ray, NMR, cryo-EMSeattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease1355USA, NIH/NIAIDX-ray, NMR, cryo-EMNortheast Structural Genomics Consortium1234USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-ray, NMRNew York SGX Research Center for Structural Genomics1041USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-ray, NMRNew York Structural Genomics Research Consortium364USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-ray, NMRTB Structural Genomics Consortium344International worldwide consortium/VariousX-ray, NMRCenter for Eukaryotic Structural Genomics219USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-ray, NMRMontreal-Kingston Bacterial Structural Genomics Initiative132Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchX-ray, NMRSoutheast Collaboratory for Structural Genomics122USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-ray, NMRStructural Proteomics in Europe118European UnionX-ray, NMRBerkeley Structural Genomics Center101USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-rayEnzyme Discovery for Natural Product Biosynthesis91USA, NIHX-rayStructural Genomics of Pathogenic Protozoa Consortium73USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-ray, NMRNew York Consortium on Membrane Protein Structure70USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-rayStructure 2 Function Project54USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-ray, NMRGPCR Network52USA, PSI/NIH/NIGMSX-rayNIAID, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; NIGMS, National Institute of General Medical Sciences; NIH, National Institutes of Health; PSI, Protein Structure Initiative. Open table in a new tab NIAID, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; NIGMS, National Institute of General Medical Sciences; NIH, National Institutes of Health; PSI, Protein Structure Initiative. The mission of SG programs was to facilitate rapid de novo structure determination for proteins representing new protein families to provide meaningful structural coverage of the genomes (1Levitt M. Nature of the protein universe.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009; 106: 11079-11084Crossref PubMed Scopus (207) Google Scholar, 2Stevens R.C. Yokoyama S. Wilson I.A. Global efforts in structural genomics.Science. 2001; 294: 89-92Crossref PubMed Scopus (172) Google Scholar, 3Tepper J. Nardi G. Sutt H. Carcinoma of the pancreas: Review of MGH experience from 1963 to 1973. Analysis of surgical failure and implications for radiation therapy.Cancer. 1976; 37: 1519-1524Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), with the presumption that eventually it would be possible to generate good-quality three-dimensional models of all proteins (4Mizianty M.J. Fan X. Yan J. Chalmers E. Woloschuk C. Joachimiak A. Kurgan L. Covering complete proteomes with X-ray structures: A current snapshot.Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2014; 70: 2781-2793Crossref PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar). Such a goal could be achieved by structural characterization of representative members of protein sequence families, followed by homology modeling for the remaining proteins. Selection of protein targets for structural studies has therefore become a crucial component of this effort (5Yeats C. Dessailly B.H. Glass E.M. Fremont D.H. Orengo C.A. Target selection for structural genomics of infectious diseases.Methods Mol. Biol. 2014; 1140: 35-51Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar, 6Pearl F.M. Martin N. Bray J.E. Buchan D.W. Harrison A.P. Lee D. Reeves G.A. Shepherd A.J. Sillitoe I. Todd A.E. Thornton J.M. Orengo C.A. A rapid classification protocol for the CATH Domain Database to support structural genomics.Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29: 223-227Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 7Marsden R.L. Orengo C.A. Target selection for structural genomics: An overview.Methods Mol. Biol. 2008; 426: 3-25Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 8Marsden R.L. Lewis T.A. Orengo C.A. Towards a comprehensive structural coverage of completed genomes: A structural genomics viewpoint.BMC Bioinformatics. 2007; 8: 86Crossref PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar, 9Levitt M. Growth of novel protein structural data.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007; 104: 3183-3188Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar), and it remains important today (10Varga J. Dobson L. Remenyi I. Tusnady G.E. TSTMP: Target selection for structural genomics of human transmembrane proteins.Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45: D325-D330Crossref PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar). The structural biology research was set to undergo a major transformation. There were urgent needs and significant challenges to advance technologies for preparation of thousands of proteins and for their structural and functional characterization. The SG programs quickly recognized and attacked deficiencies in protein production and structure solution methods, improved effectiveness and reproducibility of scientific experiments. As a result, in the past 25 years, a number of world-wide structural genomics programs developed high-throughput pipelines for target selection, protein production, characterization, crystallization, and de novo structure determination by synchrotron-based X-ray crystallography and NMR (11Graslund S. Nordlund P. Weigelt J. Hallberg B.M. Bray J. Gileadi O. Knapp S. Oppermann U. Arrowsmith C. Hui R. Ming J. dhe-Paganon S. et al.Structural Genomics ConsortiumChina Structural Genomics ConsortiumNortheast Structural Genomics ConsortiumProtein production and purification.Nat. Methods. 2008; 5: 135-146Crossref PubMed Scopus (597) Google Scholar, 12Makowska-Grzyska M. Kim Y. Maltseva N. Li H. Zhou M. Joachimiak G. Babnigg G. Joachimiak A. Protein production for structural genomics using E. coli expression.Methods Mol. Biol. 2014; 1140: 89-105Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar, 13Kim Y. Babnigg G. Jedrzejczak R. Eschenfeldt W.H. Li H. Maltseva N. Hatzos-Skintges C. Gu M. Makowska-Grzyska M. Wu R. An H. Chhor G. Joachimiak A. High-throughput protein purification and quality assessment for crystallization.Methods. 2011; 55: 12-28Crossref PubMed Scopus (102) Google Scholar, 14Minor W. Cymborowski M. Otwinowski Z. Chruszcz M. HKL-3000: The integration of data reduction and structure solution--from diffraction images to an initial model in minutes.Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2006; 62: 859-866Crossref PubMed Scopus (1339) Google Scholar). These standardized protocols ensured reproducibility of experiments and resulted in higher data quality. The tools developed by the SG consortia that streamlined the gene-to-structure approach significantly benefitted biological and biomedical research, providing insights into novel structural and functional space (11Graslund S. Nordlund P. Weigelt J. Hallberg B.M. Bray J. Gileadi O. Knapp S. Oppermann U. Arrowsmith C. Hui R. Ming J. dhe-Paganon S. et al.Structural Genomics ConsortiumChina Structural Genomics ConsortiumNortheast Structural Genomics ConsortiumProtein production and purification.Nat. Methods. 2008; 5: 135-146Crossref PubMed Scopus (597) Google Scholar, 15Burley S.K. Joachimiak A. Montelione G.T. Wilson I.A. Contributions to the NIH-nigms protein structure initiative from the PSI production centers.Structure. 2008; 16: 5-11Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar, 16Chance M.R. Bresnick A.R. Burley S.K. Jiang J.S. Lima C.D. Sali A. Almo S.C. Bonanno J.B. Buglino J.A. Boulton S. Chen H. Eswar N. He G. Huang R. Ilyin V. et al.Structural genomics: A pipeline for providing structures for the biologist.Protein Sci. 2002; 11: 723-738Crossref PubMed Scopus (145) Google Scholar, 17Elsliger M.A. Deacon A.M. Godzik A. Lesley S.A. Wooley J. Wuthrich K. Wilson I.A. The JCSG high-throughput structural biology pipeline.Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 2010; 66: 1137-1142Crossref PubMed Scopus (86) Google Scholar, 18Grabowski M. Chruszcz M. Zimmerman M.D. Kirillova O. Minor W. Benefits of structural genomics for drug discovery research.Infect. Disord. Drug Targets. 2009; 9: 459-474Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar, 19Anderson W.F. Structural genomics and drug discovery for infectious diseases.Infect. Disord. Drug Targets. 2009; 9: 507-517Crossref PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar). The advancements resulted in the determination of over 14,000 protein structures worldwide, mostly from unique protein families, and increased structural coverage of the rapidly expanding protein universe. These three-dimensional models based on experimental data were deposited to the macromolecular structure repository, the Protein Data Bank J. Z. G. H. The Protein Data Acids Res. PubMed Google and were made to the scientific the technologies that to structure determination and models were and by the biology The experimental data by the SG to the community and by in of to structural coverage of thousands of protein families D. de T.A. Thornton J.M. Orengo C.A. and from the Struct. Biol. 2011; 11: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. E. Zimmerman M.D. Minor W. The of structural genomics: The Struct. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), SG programs many targets for the of for Protein Structure A. M. K. J. assessment of methods of protein structure PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), a to the and progress of protein structure of unique structural to protein structure and improved the quality of models in has protein PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, E. in protein PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), to a major goal of SG programs of good-quality three-dimensional models for all proteins. The structural genomics effort was in the National Institutes of Health funded the of the Protein Structure The PSI the were on structural genomics studies of a range of model this over protein structures were of which were as to their sequence with other proteins. the the number of funded research expanded to The goal was to methods in to a large number of proteins and development in the SG the of the to the community over protein of these were of the structures were of proteins of The PSI was called and to on the scientific of The PSI with community and applied the structure determination pipelines to a range of important biological and biomedical as and proteins. The SG and that were biology between the Center for Structural Genomics and the Natural Product resulted in PDB and N. J. Hatzos-Skintges C. M. Babnigg G. Joachimiak A. Natural of the in a Biol. PubMed Scopus Google led to important in novel, as growth and of these structures for the that functional in G. K. G. E.M. Joachimiak G. Jedrzejczak R. Babnigg G. Joachimiak A. The of a novel of the A Acids Res. 2017; 45: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the of the PSI were structures with the of them of these were by X-ray and the by NMR M. E. Zimmerman M.D. Minor W. The of structural genomics: The Struct. PubMed Scopus Google of a of A family in that as a in growth G. K. G. E.M. Joachimiak G. Jedrzejczak R. Babnigg G. Joachimiak A. The of a novel of the A Acids Res. 2017; 45: PubMed Scopus Google as a of structure by the Center for Structural Genomics in with biology of from human A G. K. G. E.M. Joachimiak G. Jedrzejczak R. Babnigg G. Joachimiak A. The of a novel of the A Acids Res. 2017; 45: PubMed Scopus Google to the were other structural genomics programs in and Structural Genomics Consortium Structural Proteomics Structural Proteomics in and Protein in the Structural Genomics/Proteomics and international Structural Genomics Consortium The on proteins and drug targets from the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious a structural genomics Structural Genomics for Infectious the and human pathogens. The and target from the biology These over of these structures were The of high-throughput methods the and needed to structural information about proteins to drug and to international effort that from to the of the the scientific community has over structures D. M. Cymborowski M. M. A. Z. M. M. Minor W. A for structural Sci. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), with of them by Structural Genomics for Infectious of these structures were by X-ray crystallography Y. J. Maltseva N. C. Jedrzejczak R. M. S. V. G. K. Joachimiak A. to and from Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. S.A. S. M. Jedrzejczak R. S. Kim Y. V. C.A. C. et of from and with Commun. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Y. Jedrzejczak R. Maltseva M. M. Godzik A. K. Joachimiak A. structure of from Sci. 29: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, K. Kim Y. Jedrzejczak R. Maltseva L. M. Joachimiak A. structures of the to PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M.A. A. D. and of the Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google was and important contribution from as D. M. Cymborowski M. M. A. Z. M. M. Minor W. A for structural Sci. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M.A. A. D. and of the Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, G. Structural characterization of and to Mol. PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar). SG programs a number of in with the biology from PSI The structures of protein These proteins and were to be of the little sequence homology with proteins of an effort to into the of these proteins, the structure of from was protein that and a wide for protein S. A. Zhou M. C.A. Joachimiak G. S. Joachimiak A. A of a protein 2006; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the a structure of a from P. that a J. X. H. A. A. Joachimiak A. structure of protein from Struct. 2011; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Center for Structural Genomics structures in the PDB of which were by PSI with homology models for the a three-dimensional of in the Y. I. D. Li Z. L. K. Deacon A.M. Wooley J. Lesley S.A. Wilson I.A. A. Godzik A. structural of the central of 2009; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The Center for Structural Genomics has that structural data with to about and of PSI the York SGX Research Center for Structural structures of protein from human and and These important drug and their structures provide insights into and development with the from other SG it to a and repository for experimental and drug discovery for protein S.C. Bonanno J.B. J.M. S. V. S. S. R. D. M. S. Y. J. et al.Structural genomics of protein Struct. 2007; 8: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Structural Genomics Consortium funded by PSI important data to understand the of protein structures and tools for protein N. R. G. R. Montelione G.T. D. for protein PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). These structural to protein on these it was possible to a protein The SG programs many novel structures with new in K. M. Y. R. Joachimiak A. J. structure of the 1 A novel and biological Biol. 2002; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). 1 a novel, that of of and and with on The structure of the into structural and functional studies of the a role in and of and and structural genomics for an of the central genomics information a and an structure of all proteins of these information to be for in the an from the from Y. I. D. Li Z. L. K. Deacon A.M. Wooley J. Lesley S.A. Wilson I.A. A. Godzik A. structural of the central of 2009; PubMed Scopus Google of proteins structures to the of by the of the The on the of the of the or the the by the of the last and the of the the of the from the N. R. G. R. Montelione G.T. D. for protein PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). by of structure of the a of and in of that in the structure in and with and as The which with the in a of the structure with and The that with an a between and the of in the The in with their The with the A and the from K. M. Y. R. Joachimiak A. J. structure of the 1 A novel and biological Biol. 2002; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). 1 the initial it was that it possible to high-throughput production pipelines and generate large number of proteins in for structural It that the of these pipelines was not the to all information and the data to target selection, and protocols M.J. The protein structure initiative structural biology A structural biology Struct. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). and were to high-throughput structure determination led to production of proteins for structural structures of higher quality and improved of the data. To structural genomics the A. P. P. C. J. R. A. J. A. M. J. and to biological Acids Res. 2014; PubMed Scopus Google was to and biological were developed to and effectiveness and reproducibility of experiments. These were as that later were into databases M. E. Zimmerman M.D. Minor W. The of structural genomics: The Struct. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Z. G. H. J. The Protein Data Bank and the of structural Struct. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), with the and structure to the Target Database L. R. J. A target for structural genomics PubMed Scopus (145) Google Scholar, J. Z. Chen L. H. The Protein Data Bank and structural genomics.Nucleic Acids Res. PubMed Scopus Google and and Data A. L. de J. Chen L. J. The PDB information for structural genomics.Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; PubMed Google which were eventually in the M.J. W. R. A. K. L. J. M. Minor W. et protein structure initiative structural genomics Acids Res. 2009; 37: PubMed Scopus Google and Structural M.J. The protein structure initiative structural biology A structural biology Struct. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M.J. K. L. J. L. J. A. Minor W. R. et structural biology A to protein and Struct. 2011; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). These databases of for deposited to the PDB were important information about these data in was the SG structures new challenges to the PDB The of structural genomics on the protein data J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). These programs were of the National Institutes of Health to all data to the The for were in as of the for standards were later set as of a in which made and the them H. community has the Protein Data Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, W.F. C. D. A. C. J. for the and of the Protein Data 2011; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. E. A. H. Z. K. J.M. Y. N. S. L. et of structures in the Protein Data 2017; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The SG programs and biology community with the PDB to facilitate the rapid of data and the progress of the the the to for structure a of and standards were for X-ray crystallography and later for NMR and structures as A. R. Montelione G.T. protein structures by structural genomics 2007; 66: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, A. Chen X. J. J.S. and structure validation for proteins and Acids Res. 2007; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, H. V. S. Z. and of structures by X-ray diffraction to the Protein Data Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, W. on the validation and modeling of structures of biological 2011; Google Scholar, for the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). A set of PDB was and by agencies and scientific S. E. A. H. Z. K. J.M. Y. N. S. L. et of structures in the Protein Data 2017; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). and as an to the scientific Structural genomic programs structure which resulted in of deposited The growth of the PDB was the SG structures were and the of SG structures were the PDB increased from to or with SG programs significant of unique the PDB protein sequence information and other data with protein structure and to homology models A. L. de J. Chen L. J. The PDB information for structural genomics.Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; PubMed Google Scholar). Functional coverage be to and molecular and I. N. N. P. L. C. N. M. S. K. et structural coverage of functional Acids Res. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Structural genomics development and to it the biology Structure solution using X-ray diffraction was The tools developed for structure validation to rapidly and of structural The PDB has become a repository of structures of biological and their which the community and the structural data S.K. H. S. Protein Data Bank The macromolecular structure Mol. Biol. 2017; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, The data of structural PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). for homology models G. G. S. M. N. homology Biol. PubMed Google and structures S.K. G. H. S. Sali A. J. A for structural 2017; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). data be deposited into M. Cymborowski M. Minor W. The for reproducibility in macromolecular of the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. Cymborowski M. P. H. Zimmerman M.D. M.A. Burley S.K. Minor W. A of macromolecular diffraction Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), challenges as the of data with crystallography experiments and other R. N. J. D. V. data and methods for high-throughput of crystallography PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar). There to with other databases and new community especially in support of drug discovery K. C. J.A. J.M. E. G. D. Burley S.K. P. et of the validation Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), rapidly expanding data data for 2010; PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar), models J. C.A. M. D. model on the of proteins using Commun. PubMed Google Scholar), as as Department of funded A.P. R.L. S. P. D. S. D. et The Department of biology PubMed Scopus Google and to Minor on the of The that of with the of this for this was by from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious National Institutes of Health Department of Health and and in by the Department of of and for the of by National The the of the and not the of the National Institutes of A.J. and the and and the The has by of National a Department of of The for and on a worldwide in to to the public, and and by or on of the

Topics & Concepts

Structural genomicsGenomicsProtein Data BankComputational biologyComputer scienceBiologyGeneticsGenomeProtein structureGeneBiochemistryProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Structural genomics and the Protein Data Bank | Litcius