Litcius/Paper detail

Comparison of machining performance of stainless steel 316L produced by selective laser melting and electron beam melting

Seyed Hosseini, Dinesh Mallipeddi, Jonas Holmberg, Lars‐Erik Rännar, Andrey Koptyug, W. Sjöström, Peter Krajnik, Uta Klement

2022Procedia CIRP10 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Powder bed fusion processes based additively manufactured SS 316L components fall short of surface integrity requirements needed for optimal functional performance. Hence, machining is required to achieve dimensional accuracy and to enhance surface integrity characteristics. This research is focused on comparing the material removal performance of 316L produced by PBF-LB (laser) and PBF-EB (electron beam) in terms of tool wear and surface integrity. The results showed comparable surface topography and residual stress profiles. While the hardness profiles revealed work hardening at the surface where PBF-LB specimens being more susceptible to work hardening. The investigation also revealed differences in the progress of the tool wear when machining specimens produced with either PBF-LB or PBF-EB.

Topics & Concepts

MachiningSurface integrityMaterials scienceResidual stressFusionHardening (computing)Work hardeningCathode rayMetallurgyLaserComposite materialScanning electron microscopeElectronMicrostructureOpticsLinguisticsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsPhilosophyLayer (electronics)Additive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesWelding Techniques and Residual StressesAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Comparison of machining performance of stainless steel 316L produced by selective laser melting and electron beam melting | Litcius