Litcius/Paper detail

16S Ribosomal RNA PCR Versus Conventional Diagnostic Culture in the Investigation of Suspected Bacterial Keratitis

Tobi F. Somerville, Caroline Corless, Henri Sueke, Timothy Neal, Stephen B. Kaye

2020Translational Vision Science & Technology38 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare conventional diagnostic culture (CDC) to 16S ribosomal RNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis for diagnosing bacterial keratitis. Methods: Samples collected from 100 consecutive patients presenting to the Royal Liverpool University Hospital with bacterial keratitis were processed using CDC and 16S PCR analysis. Results: = 0.04). In CDC negative samples, 16S PCR identified more pathogens than CDC in 16S PCR negative samples. Neither order of sample collection nor prior antimicrobial use affected the detection rate. Conclusions: 16S rRNA gene PCR performed in addition to CDC on corneal samples from patients with clinically suspected bacterial keratitis led to additional pathogen detection. Translational Relevance: 16S rRNA gene PCR should be developed to become an additional part of clinical service for patients with bacterial keratitis rather than used in isolation.

Topics & Concepts

16S ribosomal RNAMicrobiological cultureKeratitisMicrobiologyRibosomal RNAPolymerase chain reactionPathogenBiology23S ribosomal RNABacteriaMedicineGeneRNAGeneticsRibosomeOcular Infections and TreatmentsCorneal surgery and disordersOrthopedic Infections and Treatments
16S Ribosomal RNA PCR Versus Conventional Diagnostic Culture in the Investigation of Suspected Bacterial Keratitis | Litcius