Litcius/Paper detail

Quantitative measurements of aerosols from air-polishing and ultrasonic devices: (How) can we protect ourselves?

Manuela E. Kaufmann, Alex Solderer, Andrea Gubler, Florian J. Wegehaupt, Thomas Attin, Patrick R. Schmidlin

2020PLoS ONE31 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

AIM: To assess the distribution and deposition of aerosols during simulated periodontal therapy. METHODS: A manikin with simulated fluorescein salivation was treated by four experienced dentists applying two different periodontal treatment options, i.e. air-polishing with an airflow device or ultrasonic scaling in the upper and lower anterior front for 5 minutes, respectively. Aerosol deposition was quantitatively measured on 21 pre-defined locations with varying distances to the manikins mouth in triplicates using absorbent filter papers. RESULTS: The selected periodontal interventions resulted in different contamination levels around the patient's mouth. The highest contamination could be measured on probes on the patient's chest and forehead but also on the practitioner's glove. With increasing distance to the working site contamination of the probes decreased with both devices. Air-polishing led to greater contamination than ultrasonic. CONCLUSION: Both devices showed contamination of the nearby structures, less contamination was detected when using the ultrasonic. Affirming the value of wearing protective equipment we support the need for universal barrier precautions and effective routine infection control in dental practice.

Topics & Concepts

ContaminationPolishingUltrasonic sensorAerosolDentistryEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringMedicineComposite materialChemistryRadiologyEcologyOrganic chemistryBiologyDental Research and COVID-19Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchNosocomial Infections in ICU